ArticleF1000Research2017
What is open peer review? A systematic review.
Article in F1000Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
85 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Co-reviewing and ghostwriting by early-career researchers in the peer review of manuscripts.eLife · 2019Pooled it
- Integrating community Live Reviews into academic publishing: an exploratory study.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- Motivations and barriers to engaging in peer review: a qualitative study.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- Possibilities for the peer review of interdisciplinary research: a small-scale qualitative study.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- Reviewer recommendations and editorial outcomes in peer review: a longitudinal analysis of agreement and disagreement across review rounds.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- Evolution of manuscript peer review: expanding roles in exercise rehabilitation research.Journal of exercise rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of the researcher-led "Peerspectives" peer review training course on review quality, knowledge, and skills among doctoral students in the biomedical sciences: a pre-post study.Research integrity and peer review · 2026Article
- Peer review: historical evolution and reviewers' learning.Insights into imaging · 2026Review
- Double anonymous peer review inJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- Promoting awareness of open access publishing in speech-language therapy and audiology: Lessons from multilingual language assessment research.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2026Article
- Effect of Pharmacy Student Peer Supervision on the Accuracy of Admission Medication Reconciliation: Prospective Pre-Post Observational Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Observational
- Living publications: How interactive artificial intelligence platforms are transforming research communication.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Review
- Does the disconnect between the peer-reviewed label and reality explain the peer review crisis, and can open peer review or preprints resolve it? A narrative review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Implementing is necessary: the gap between discourse and practice in global open science.Brazilian oral research · 2026Review
- Impact of leading plant research centers of excellence on the scientific and socio-economic development in Europe.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- Gender and disciplinary differences in grant proposal peer review: Content and sentiment in 39,280 reports.PloS one · 2026Article
- Beyond predatory journals: peer review transparency as a preventive strategy for editorial integrity in scholarly communication.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- Opening the review: perceptions and challenges of Open Science at CSP.Cadernos de saude publica · 2026Article
- Article
- Rethinking peer review in medicine: From trust to transformation.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025Article
25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.