ArticleKorean journal of anesthesiology2017
Statistical data presentation.
Article in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial prescription KAP among physicians in primary care institutions in Southwest China.PloS one · 2025Article
- The principles of presenting statistical results using figures.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2022Article
- The principles of presenting statistical results: Table.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2021Article
- pH-Sensitive Dairy-Derived Hydrogels with a Prolonged Drug Release Profile for Cancer Treatment.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Choice of y-axis can mislead readers.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2020Article
- Statistical Accuracy in Rheumatology Research.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2019Review
- Multimodal analgesia with multiple intermittent doses of erector spinae plane block through a catheter after total mastectomy: a retrospective observational study.The Korean journal of pain · 2019Article
- Selecting best-suited "patient-related outcomes" in older people admitted to an acute geriatric or emergency frailty unit and applying quality improvement research to improve patient care.Patient related outcome measures · 2018Review
- Establishing a global quality of care benchmark report.Health informatics journalArticle
- Utilizing tables, figures, charts and graphs to enhance the readability of a research paper.Journal of postgraduate medicineArticle
- A simplification of intricate multifocal electroretinogram understanding: A mini-review.Oman journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data are usually collected in a raw format and thus the inherent information is difficult to understand. Therefore, raw data need to be summarized, processed, and analyzed. However, no matter how well manipulated, the information derived from the raw data should be presented in an effective format, otherwise, it would be a great loss for both authors and readers. In this article, the techniques of data and information presentation in textual, tabular, and graphical forms are introduced. Text is the principal method for explaining findings, outlining trends, and providing contextual information. A table is best suited for representing individual information and represents both quantitative and qualitative information. A graph is a very effective visual tool as it displays data at a glance, facilitates comparison, and can reveal trends and relationships within the data such as changes over time, frequency distribution, and correlation or relative share of a whole. Text, tables, and graphs for data and information presentation are very powerful communication tools. They can make an article easy to understand, attract and sustain the interest of readers, and efficiently present large amounts of complex information. Moreover, as journal editors and reviewers glance at these presentations before reading the whole article, their importance cannot be ignored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.