Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28580003›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017

RNA Interference: A Novel Source of Resistance to Combat Plant Parasitic Nematodes.

Sagar Banerjee, Anamika Banerjee, Sarvajeet S Gill, Om P Gupta, Anil Dahuja, Pradeep K Jain, Anil Sirohi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. RNAi Crop Protection Advances.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sagar BanerjeeDivision of Nematology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR)New Delhi, India.
Anamika BanerjeeDivision of Nematology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR)New Delhi, India.
Sarvajeet S GillCentre for Biotechnology, Maharshi Dayanand UniversityRohtak, India.
Om P GuptaDivision of Biochemistry, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR)New Delhi, India.
Anil DahujaDivision of Biochemistry, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR)New Delhi, India.
Pradeep K JainNational Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology (ICAR)New Delhi, India.
Anil SirohiDivision of Nematology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR)New Delhi, India.
Indian Agricultural Research Institute · INMaharshi Dayanand University · INNational Research Centre on Plant Biotechnology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant parasitic nematodes cause severe damage and yield loss in major crops all over the world. Available control strategies include use of insecticides/nematicides but these have proved detrimental to the environment, while other strategies like crop rotation and resistant cultivars have serious limitations. This scenario provides an opportunity for the utilization of technological advances like RNA interference (RNAi) to engineer resistance against these devastating parasites. First demonstrated in the model free living nematode,

Indexed as

cyst nematodesdsRNAhost delivered RNAiplant parasitic nematodesroot-knot nematodessiRNA

Identifiers

PMID28580003
PMCPMC5437379
OpenAlexW2616452314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.