Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28579841›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2017

Handover checklist: testing a standardization process in an Italian hospital.

Davide Ferorelli, Teresa Giandola, Mariangela Laterza, Biagio Solarino, Angela Pezzolla, Fiorenza Zotti, Alessandro Dell'Erba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Improving Transfer of Care Between Psychiatrists and Residents: Participants' Perspective on the Implementation of a Handover Protocol in a Psychiatric Emergency.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Incident Reporting System in an Italian University Hospital: A New Tool for Improving Patient Safety.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Davide FerorelliInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine.
Teresa GiandolaSection of Legal Medicine.
Mariangela LaterzaSection of Legal Medicine.
Biagio SolarinoSection of Legal Medicine.
Angela PezzollaDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Fiorenza ZottiSection of Legal Medicine.
Alessandro Dell'ErbaInterdisciplinary Department of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to standardize and rationalize the handover, a critical and essential moment in common health care practices, through the realization of an efficient and standardized checklist, which could be used daily to ensure complete, thorough and effective handover. The principal purpose of the implementation of the handover is to reduce errors due to superficial and insufficient communication.

methodsThe "operative group" defined the phases to the realization of the delineated aims: at first, the direct observation and the consequent realization of a handover checklist model and then, the experimental phases (trials). The handover checklist model was used for a month and it was daily and duly completed by the doctors who took part in the trial. To prove the success of the study, three questionnaires were distributed on different occasions.

resultsAnalyzing the answers to the questionnaires, the importance of the handover has come to light and that for the most part, the doctors consider it an essential and irreplaceable moment in daily health care work. Moreover, it became obvious that the use of the handover checklist guaranteed a considerable improvement in the traditional handover in terms of security, completeness, care continuity and clarity. The handover checklist was completely appreciated by the majority of the participant doctors who agree with the definitive introduction of it in their unit.

conclusionsOur study indicated the consistency of the handover checklist as an instrument to implement the handover and, indirectly, to improve the quality of the care.

Indexed as

clinical risk managementhandover checklisthealth care workers training

Identifiers

PMID28579841
PMCPMC5449138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.