Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28579836›Full record

ReviewDrug, healthcare and patient safety2017

Update on the renal toxicity of iodinated contrast drugs used in clinical medicine.

Michele Andreucci, Teresa Faga, Raffaele Serra, Giovambattista De Sarro, Ashour Michael

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug, healthcare and patient safety, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05189522 (Innova Breeze®-Based Roadmap for Peripheral Arterial Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05189522 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Innova Breeze®-Based Roadmap for Peripheral Arterial Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondation Hôpital Saint-JosephRan2022 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsPeripheral Arterial DiseaseArmsInnova Breeze®-based roadmap, Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michele AndreucciRenal Unit, Department of Health Sciences.
Teresa FagaRenal Unit, Department of Health Sciences.
Raffaele SerraInteruniversity Center of Phlebolymphology (CIFL), International Research and Educational Program in Clinical and Experimental Biotechnology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences.
Giovambattista De SarroPharmacology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy.
Ashour MichaelRenal Unit, Department of Health Sciences.
Department of Medical Sciences · BYMagna Graecia University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important side effect of diagnostic contrast drugs is contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI; a sudden decrease in renal function) occurring 48-72 hours after injection of a contrast drug that cannot be attributed to other causes. Its existence has recently been challenged, because of some retrospective studies in which the incidence of AKI was not different between subjects who received a contrast drug and those who did not, even using propensity score matching to prevent selection bias. For some authors, only patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m

Indexed as

acute kidney injuryAKIARFcontrast mediaintracellular signalingrenal failure

Identifiers

PMID28579836
PMCPMC5447694
OpenAlexW2619946555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.