Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28579761›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2017

Barriers and facilitators associated with colonoscopy completion in individuals with multiple chronic conditions: a qualitative study.

Shahnaz Sultan, Melissa R Partin, Phalgoon Shah, Jennifer LeLaurin, Ivette Magaly Freytes, Chandylen L Nightingale, Susan F Fesperman, Barbara A Curbow, Rebecca J Beyth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Psychometric Evaluation of the Patient Experience Colonoscopy Scale.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025
    Article
  3. Comparative Effectiveness of Surveillance Colonoscopy Intervals on Colorectal Cancer Outcomes in a National Cohort of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Patient Experiences with Colonoscopy: A Qualitative Study.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shahnaz SultanCenter for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System.
Melissa R PartinCenter for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System.
Phalgoon ShahDepartment of Medicine, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI.
Jennifer LeLaurinCenter of Innovation on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL.
Ivette Magaly FreytesCenter of Innovation on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL.
Chandylen L NightingaleDepartment of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem NC.
Susan F FespermanCenter of Innovation on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System, Gainesville, FL.
Barbara A CurbowDepartment of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Rebecca J BeythDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA recommendation to undergo a colonoscopy, an invasive procedure that requires commitment and motivation, planning (scheduling and finding a driver) and preparation (diet restriction and laxative consumption), may be uniquely challenging for individuals with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). This qualitative study aimed to describe the barriers and facilitators to colonoscopy experienced by such patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsSemistructured focus groups were conducted with male Veterans who were scheduled for outpatient colonoscopy and either failed to complete the procedure or completed the examination. Focus group recordings were transcribed and analyzed by an inductive grounded approach using constant comparative analysis.

resultsForty-four individuals aged 51-83 years participated in this study (23 adherent and 21 nonadherent). Participants had an average of 7.4 chronic conditions (range 2-14). The five most common chronic conditions were hypertension (75%), hyperlipidemia (75%), osteoarthritis/degenerative joint disease (59%), atherosclerotic heart disease (48%), and diabetes mellitus (36%). We identified four unique themes that influenced motivation to undergo a colonoscopy: competing medical priorities, low perceived benefit, a prior negative colonoscopy experience, and pre-existing medical conditions. Additionally, we identified four themes that influenced individuals' ability to complete the examination: difficulty with bowel cleansing, difficulty with travel, worry about exacerbation of pre-existing conditions, and heightened concerns about potential complications.

conclusionMCCs are common in individuals referred for colonoscopy and generate unique barriers to colonoscopy completion related to medication, dietary changes, transportation, preparation processes, symptoms exacerbation, and complication concerns. Future research should examine whether tailored interventions that include education and support in addressing the unique barriers can enhance colonoscopy completion.

Indexed as

adherencecolonoscopy barriersmultiple chronic conditionsVeterans

Identifiers

PMID28579761
PMCPMC5449171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.