Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28579687›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2017

Therapeutic Ultrasound and Prostate Cancer.

Karthik M Sundaram, Sam S Chang, David F Penson, Sandeep Arora

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03625336 (MR Imaging of Prostatic Calcifications), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03625336 withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

MR Imaging of Prostatic Calcifications

TypeobservationalSponsorVanderbilt University Medical CenterRan2019 to 2021Enrolled0ConditionsProstate CalcificationArmsMRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Focal therapy for prostate cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Therapeutic US Applications for the Abdomen and Pelvis.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karthik M SundaramDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sam S ChangDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
David F PensonDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sandeep AroraDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic ultrasound approaches including high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) are emerging as popular minimally invasive alternative treatments for localized, low-to-intermediate risk prostate cancer. FDA approval was recently granted for two ultrasound-guided HIFU devices. Clinical trials for devices using MRI guidance are ongoing. The current level of evidence for whole-gland ultrasound ablation suggests that its clinical efficacy and adverse event rates including erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence are similar to current definitive therapies such as radical prostatectomy and external-beam radiotherapy. Short-term data suggest that more focal therapy could reduce the rates of adverse events.

Indexed as

high-intensity directional ultrasoundhigh-intensity focused ultrasoundprostate cancertherapeutic ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID28579687
PMCPMC5453783
OpenAlexW2621113755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.