Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28579538›Full record

Trial reportGastroenterology2017

Late Recurrence of Barrett's Esophagus After Complete Eradication of Intestinal Metaplasia is Rare: Final Report From Ablation in Intestinal Metaplasia Containing Dysplasia Trial.

Cary C Cotton, W Asher Wolf, Bergein F Overholt, Nan Li, Charles J Lightdale, Herbert C Wolfsen, Sarina Pasricha, Kenneth K Wang, Nicholas J Shaheen, AIM Dysplasia Trial Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05056051 (Additive Value of Wide-Area Transepithelial Sampling), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05056051 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Additive Value of Wide-Area Transepithelial Sampling (WATS3D) in Detection of Recurrence of Intestinal Metaplasia Following Endoscopic Eradication Therapy (EET) for Barrett's Esophagus-Related Neoplasia

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2020 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsBarrett Esophagus, Esophageal CancerArmsWATS-3D tissue sampling prior to forceps biopsies, WATS-3D tissue sampling following forceps biopsies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Quality indicators for upper GI endoscopy.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Quality Indicators for Upper GI Endoscopy.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Novel histologic score predicts recurrent intestinal metaplasia after successful endoscopic eradication therapy.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Optimized Surveillance Intervals Following Endoscopic Eradication of Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus: An International Cohort Study.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Utility of ancillary studies in the diagnosis and risk assessment of Barrett's esophagus and dysplasia.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cary C CottonFrom the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
W Asher WolfFrom the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Bergein F OverholtGastrointestinal Associates, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Nan LiFrom the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Charles J LightdaleDivision of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Herbert C WolfsenGastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Sarina PasrichaFrom the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Kenneth K WangGastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Nicholas J ShaheenFrom the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Electronic address: Nicholas_shaheen@med.unc.edu.
AIM Dysplasia Trial Group

Funding

DIGESTIVE DISEASES EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32DK007634 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ROBERT S. SANDLER · 1990 to 2026
$7.4M
SHORT-TERM RESEARCH TRAININGT35DK007386 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Evan Samuel Dellon · 1986 to 2026
$4.1M
Non-Endoscopic Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus Following Ablative TherapyK24DK100548 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2013 to 2017
$896k
NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK100548NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007634NIDDK NIH HHS T35 DK007386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsThe goal of treatment for Barrett's esophagus (BE) with dysplasia is complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CEIM). The long-term durability of CEIM has not been well characterized, so the frequency and duration of surveillance are unclear. We report results from a 5-year follow-up analysis of patients with BE and dysplasia treated by radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the randomized controlled Ablation of Intestinal Metaplasia Containing Dysplasia (AIM) trial.

methodsParticipants for the AIM Dysplasia trial (18-80 years old) were recruited from 19 sites in the United States and had endoscopic evidence of non-nodular dysplastic BE ≤8 cm in length. Subjects (n = 127) were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to receive either RFA (entire BE segment ablated circumferentially) or a sham endoscopic procedure; patients in the sham group were offered RFA treatment 1 year later, and all patients were followed for 5 years. We collected data on BE recurrence (defined as intestinal metaplasia in the tubular esophagus) and dysplastic BE recurrence among patients who achieved CEIM. We constructed Kaplan-Meier estimates and applied parametric survival analysis to examine proportions of patients without any recurrence and without dysplastic recurrence.

resultsOf 127 patients in the AIM Dysplasia trial, 119 received RFA and met inclusion criteria. Of those 119, 110 (92%) achieved CEIM. Over 401 person-years of follow-up (mean, 3.6 years per patient; range, 0.2-5.8 years), 35 of 110 (32%) patients had recurrence of BE or dysplasia, and 19 (17%) had dysplasia recurrence. The incidence rate of BE recurrence was 10.8 per 100 person-years overall (95% CI, 7.8-15.0); 8.3 per 100 person-years among patients with baseline low-grade dysplasia (95% CI, 4.9-14.0), and 13.5 per 100 person-years among patients with baseline high-grade dysplasia (95% CI 8.8-20.7). The incidence rate of dysplasia recurrence was 5.2 per 100 person-years overall (95% CI 3.3-8.2); 3.3 per 100 person-years among patients with baseline low-grade dysplasia (95% CI 1.5-7.2), and 7.3 per 100 person-years among patients with baseline high-grade dysplasia (95% CI 4.2-12.5). Neither BE nor dysplasia recurred at a constant rate. There was a greater probability of recurrence in the first year following CEIM than in the following 4 years combined.

conclusionsIn this analysis of prospective cohort data from the AIM Dysplasia trial, we found BE to recur after CEIM by RFA in almost one third of patients with baseline dysplastic disease; most recurrences occurred during the first year after CEIM. However, patients who achieved CEIM and remained BE free at 1 year after RFA had a low risk of BE recurrence. Studies are needed to determine when surveillance can be decreased or discontinued; our study did not identify any BE or dysplasia recurrence after 4 years of surveillance.

Indexed as

Population SurveillanceAgedBarrett EsophagusCatheter AblationDisease ProgressionEsophagusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMetaplasiaMiddle AgedMucous MembraneProspective StudiesHGDHigh Grade DysplasiaLGDLong-term OutcomeLow Grade DysplasiaPrognostic Factor

Identifiers

PMID28579538
PMCPMC5581683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.