Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28579453›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2017

Building dialogues between clinical and biomedical research through cross-species collaborations.

Hsiao-Tuan Chao, Lucy Liu, Hugo J Bellen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Scaling up to studyCancer cell & microenvironment · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hsiao-Tuan ChaoDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Child Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States; Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, United States. Electronic address: hc140077@bcm.edu.
Lucy LiuJan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, United States; Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Hugo J BellenJan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, United States; Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States; Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States; Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States. Electronic address: hbellen@bcm.edu.

Funding

Child Neurologist Career Development Program (CNCDP)K12NS098482 · NINDS · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI SCHLAGGAR, BRADLEY L · 2016 to 2025
$26.2M
Transposon induced disruption of most Drosophila genesR01GM067858 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BELLEN, HUGO J · 2003 to 2020
$15.7M
Zebrafish CoreU54NS093793 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BELLEN, HUGO J · 2015 to 2022
$7.5M
Expansion and characterization of the Drosophila Toolkit to study SARS-CoV-2R24OD022005 · OD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BELLEN, HUGO J · 2016 to 2023
$7.4M
GRADUATE TRAINING IN NEUROSCIENCET32GM008507 · NIGMS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI RASBAND, MATTHEW N · 1994 to 2019
$4.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067858NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008507NIH HHS R24 OD022005NINDS NIH HHS K12 NS098482NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS093793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, biomedical science is equipped with an impressive array of technologies and genetic resources that bolster our basic understanding of fundamental biology and enhance the practice of modern medicine by providing clinicians with a diverse toolkit to diagnose, prognosticate, and treat a plethora of conditions. Many significant advances in our understanding of disease mechanisms and therapeutic interventions have arisen from fruitful dialogues between clinicians and biomedical research scientists. However, the increasingly specialized scientific and medical disciplines, globalization of science and technology, and complex datasets often hinder the development of effective interdisciplinary collaborations between clinical medicine and biomedical research. The goal of this review is to provide examples of diverse strategies to enhance communication and collaboration across diverse disciplines. First, we discuss examples of efforts to foster interdisciplinary collaborations at institutional and multi-institutional levels. Second, we explore resources and tools for clinicians and research scientists to facilitate effective bi-directional dialogues. Third, we use our experiences in neurobiology and human genetics to highlight how communication between clinical medicine and biomedical research lead to effective implementation of cross-species model organism approaches to uncover the biological underpinnings of health and disease.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationAnimalsBiomedical ResearchCommunity-Institutional RelationsDisease Models, AnimalDrosophilaHumansMiceNeurodegenerative DiseasesPatient ParticipationSocial NetworkingTranslational Research, BiomedicalZebrafishDrosophilaInterdisciplinary collaborationsModel organisms screening centerNeurological research instituteUndiagnosed diseases networkZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID28579453
PMCPMC5623622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.