Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28579078›Full record

ReviewJournal of pediatric nursing

Developmentally Supportive Care in Congenital Heart Disease: A Concept Analysis.

Jennifer K Peterson, Lorraine S Evangelista

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pediatric nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer K PetersonSue & Bill Gross School of Nursing, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States. Electronic address: jkpeter1@uci.edu.
Lorraine S EvangelistaSue & Bill Gross School of Nursing, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States. Electronic address: evangell@uci.edu.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 15PRE25300024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

theoretical principlesImproved survival of infants and children with congenital heart disease experience has led to recognition that up to half of congenital heart disease survivors also experience developmental delay. Developmentally supportive care is a care model shown in Neonatal Intensive Care Units to be associated with improved outcomes, but developmentally supportive practices with premature infants may not be equally effective in the cardiac population that includes all ages. PHENOMENA ADDRESSED: The purpose of this paper is to present a concept analysis using the Walker and Avant method in order to identify and define characteristics of developmentally supportive care as it may be applied to the population of neonates, infants, and children with congenital heart disease. A theoretical definition of developmentally supportive care is presented. RESEARCH LINKAGES: This concept analysis will provide nurses and allied health professionals with a theoretical basis to implement high quality, family-centered care that meets individual developmental needs in a population at high risk for developmental sequelae. Nursing implications for developmentally supportive care as it applies to infants and children with heart disease are discussed.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentChild, PreschoolFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleNeonatal NursingNurse's RolePatient Care PlanningPatient Care TeamProof of Concept StudyAcute careConcept analysisCongenital heart diseaseCritical carePediatric nursing

Identifiers

PMID28579078
PMCPMC6567997
OpenAlexW2617239883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.