Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28578726›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS2017

Statistically Derived Subtypes and Associations with Cerebrospinal Fluid and Genetic Biomarkers in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Latent Profile Analysis.

Joel S Eppig, Emily C Edmonds, Laura Campbell, Mark Sanderson-Cimino, Lisa Delano-Wood, Mark W Bondi, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Neuropsychiatric symptom phenotypes for early detection of risk in older adults.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joel S Eppig1San Diego State University/University of California,San Diego,Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology,San Diego,California.
Emily C Edmonds2Department of Psychiatry,University of California San Diego,School of Medicine,La Jolla,California.
Laura Campbell3Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System,San Diego,California.
Mark Sanderson-Cimino1San Diego State University/University of California,San Diego,Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology,San Diego,California.
Lisa Delano-Wood2Department of Psychiatry,University of California San Diego,School of Medicine,La Jolla,California.
Mark W Bondi2Department of Psychiatry,University of California San Diego,School of Medicine,La Jolla,California.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
University of California, San Diego · USVA San Diego Healthcare System · US

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
VIRUS-INDUCED BRAIN PATHOLOGYP50AG005131 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LAGIER-TOURENNE, CLOTILDE · 1985 to 2018
$55.4M
Re-visiting Methods for MCI Diagnosis to Improve Biomarker and Trial FindingsR01AG049810 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BONDI, MARK W, EDLAND, STEVEN DYAL · 2016 to 2020
$3.7M
Neuroimaging and Risk Factor Correlates in Aging and MCIK24AG026431 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI BONDI, MARK W · 2007 to 2016
$1.7M
Cognitive and Biomarker Profiles of Accurate and Inaccurate MCI DiagnosisIK2CX001415 · VA · VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI EDMONDS, EMILY CHARLOTTE · 2017 to 2021
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX001415NIA NIH HHS K24 AG026431NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005131NIA NIH HHS R01 AG049810NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesResearch demonstrates heterogeneous neuropsychological profiles among individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, few studies have included visuoconstructional ability or used latent mixture modeling to statistically identify MCI subtypes. Therefore, we examined whether unique neuropsychological MCI profiles could be ascertained using latent profile analysis (LPA), and subsequently investigated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, genotype, and longitudinal clinical outcomes between the empirically derived classes.

methodsA total of 806 participants diagnosed by means of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) MCI criteria received a comprehensive neuropsychological battery assessing visuoconstructional ability, language, attention/executive function, and episodic memory. Test scores were adjusted for demographic characteristics using standardized regression coefficients based on "robust" normal control performance (n=260). Calculated Z-scores were subsequently used in the LPA, and CSF-derived biomarkers, genotype, and longitudinal clinical outcome were evaluated between the LPA-derived MCI classes.

resultsStatistical fit indices suggested a 3-class model was the optimal LPA solution. The three-class LPA consisted of a mixed impairment MCI class (n=106), an amnestic MCI class (n=455), and an LPA-derived normal class (n=245). Additionally, the amnestic and mixed classes were more likely to be apolipoprotein e4+ and have worse Alzheimer's disease CSF biomarkers than LPA-derived normal subjects.

conclusionsOur study supports significant heterogeneity in MCI neuropsychological profiles using LPA and extends prior work (Edmonds et al., 2015) by demonstrating a lower rate of progression in the approximately one-third of ADNI MCI individuals who may represent "false-positive" diagnoses. Our results underscore the importance of using sensitive, actuarial methods for diagnosing MCI, as current diagnostic methods may be over-inclusive. (JINS, 2017, 23, 564-576).

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionLanguageMemory, EpisodicAgedAmyloid beta-PeptidesApolipoprotein E4AttentionBiomarkersExecutive FunctionFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleModels, StatisticalPeptide FragmentsPsychomotor PerformanceAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)Apolipoprotein E4BiomarkersPeptide Fragmentstau ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseaseAssessment of cognitive disorders/dementiaBiomarkersLatent profile analysisMild cognitive impairment (MCI)Multivariate mixture modelingNeuropsychological profiles

Identifiers

PMID28578726
PMCPMC5551901
OpenAlexW2623033653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.