Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28578710›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2017

Compliance with Clostridium difficile treatment guidelines: effect on patient outcomes.

K T Crowell, K G Julian, M Katzman, A S Berg, A Tinsley, E D Williams, W A Koltun, E Messaris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reduced Vancomycin Susceptibility in Clostridioides difficile Is Associated With Lower Rates of Initial Cure and Sustained Clinical Response.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Risk prediction for 30-day mortality among patients withAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

K T CrowellDepartment of Surgery,Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery,The Pennsylvania State University,College of Medicine,Hershey, PA,USA.
K G JulianDivision of Infectious Diseases,The Pennsylvania State University,College of Medicine,Hershey, PA,USA.
M KatzmanDivision of Infectious Diseases,The Pennsylvania State University,College of Medicine,Hershey, PA,USA.
A S BergDepartment of Public Health Sciences,The Pennsylvania State University,College of Medicine,Hershey, PA,USA.
A TinsleyDivision of Gastroenterology,The Pennsylvania State University,College of Medicine,Hershey, PA,USA.
E D WilliamsDivision of Gastroenterology,The Pennsylvania State University,College of Medicine,Hershey, PA,USA.
W A KoltunDepartment of Surgery,Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery,The Pennsylvania State University,College of Medicine,Hershey, PA,USA.
E MessarisDepartment of Surgery,Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery,The Pennsylvania State University,College of Medicine,Hershey, PA,USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guidelines for the severity classification and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) were published by Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) in 2010; however, compliance and efficacy of these guidelines has not been widely investigated. This present study assessed compliance with guidelines and its effect on CDI patient outcomes as compared with before these recommendations. A retrospective study included all adult inpatients with an initial episode of CDI treated in a single academic center from January 2009 to August 2014. Patients after guideline publication were compared with patients treated in 2009-2010. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected to stratify for disease severity. Outcome measures included compliance with guidelines, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and surgical intervention for CDI. A total of 1021 patients with CDI were included. Based upon the 2010 guidelines, 42 (28·8%) of 146 patients treated in 2009 would have been considered undertreated, and treatment progressively improved over time, as inadequate treatment decreased to 10·0% (15/148 patients) in 2014 (P = 0·0005). Overall, patient outcomes with guideline-adherent treatment decreased CDI attributable mortality twofold (P = 0·006) and CDI-related LOS by 1·9 days (P = 0·0009) when compared with undertreated patients. Compliance with IDSA/SHEA guidelines was associated with a decreased risk of mortality and LOS in hospitalized patients with CDI.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePennsylvaniaRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdherence to guidelinesClostridium difficileovertreatmentundertreatment

Identifiers

PMID28578710
PMCPMC9148850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.