Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28578688›Full record

ReviewBMC public health2017

The ticking time bomb in lifestyle-related diseases among women in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries; review of systematic reviews.

Mashael K Alshaikh, Filippos T Filippidis, Hussain A Al-Omar, Salman Rawaf, Azeem Majeed, Abdul-Majeed Salmasi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mashael K AlshaikhDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstan's Road, 3rd Floor, Reynolds Building, London, W6 8RP, UK. m.alshaikh14@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2874-2677
Filippos T FilippidisDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstan's Road, 3rd Floor, Reynolds Building, London, W6 8RP, UK.
Hussain A Al-OmarPharmacy Department, King Saud University, Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Salman RawafDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstan's Road, 3rd Floor, Reynolds Building, London, W6 8RP, UK.
Azeem MajeedDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Charing Cross Campus, St Dunstan's Road, 3rd Floor, Reynolds Building, London, W6 8RP, UK.
Abdul-Majeed SalmasiNational Heart & Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
King Saud Medical City · SAImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aims to review all published systematic reviews on the prevalence of modifiable cardiovascular disease risk factors among women from the Gulf Cooperation Council countries (GCC). This is the first review of other systematic reviews that concentrates on lifestyle related diseases among women in GCC countries only.

methodLiterature searches were carried out in three electronic databases for all published systematic reviews on the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors in the GCC countries between January 2000 and February 2016.

resultsEleven systematic reviews were identified and selected for our review. Common reported risk factors for cardiovascular disease were obesity, physical inactivity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome and hypertension. In GCC countries, obesity among the female population ranges from 29 to 45.7%, which is one of the highest rates globally, and it is linked with physical inactivity, ranging from 45 to 98.7%. The prevalence of diabetes is listed as one of the top ten factors globally, and was reported with an average of 21%. Hypertension ranged from 20.9 to 53%.

conclusionsThe high prevalence of lifestyle-related diseases among women population in GCC is a ticking time bomb and is reaching alarming levels, and require a fundamental social and political changes. These findings highlight the need for comprehensive work among the GCC to strengthen the regulatory framework to decrease and control the prevalence of these factors.

Indexed as

Life StyleSystematic Reviews as TopicAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes MellitusFemaleHumansHypertensionMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedMiddle EastObesityPrevalenceRisk FactorsCardiovascular diseaseDiabetesHypertensionMetabolic syndromeNoncommunicable diseasesObesityPhysical inactivitySmokingSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28578688
PMCPMC5455090
OpenAlexW2620695141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.