Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28578542›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2017

Citrate versus heparin anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy in small children.

Paulien A M A Raymakers-Janssen, Marc Lilien, Ingrid A van Kessel, Esther S Veldhoen, Roelie M Wösten-van Asperen, Josephus P J van Gestel

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neonatal continuous kidney replacement therapy.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Provision of continuous renal replacement therapy in children in intensive care in Australia and New Zealand.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paulien A M A Raymakers-JanssenDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p.a.m.a.raymakers-janssen@umcutrecht.nl.
Marc LilienDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ingrid A van KesselDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Esther S VeldhoenDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roelie M Wösten-van AsperenDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Josephus P J van GestelDepartment of Pediatric Intensive Care, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wilhelmina Children's Hospital · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCitrate is preferred over heparin as an anticoagulant in adult continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). However, its potential adverse effects and data on use in CRRT in infants and toddlers is limited. We conducted a prospective study on using citrate in CRRT in critically ill small children.

methodsChildren who underwent CRRT with the smallest filter in our PICU between November 2011 and November 2016 were included. Both heparin and citrate were applied according to a strict protocol. Our primary outcome was circuit survival time. Secondary outcomes were alkalosis, citrate toxicity, and number of red blood cell transfusions.

resultsHeparin was used in six patients (121 circuits, total CRRT time 3723 h). Citrate was used in 14 patients (105 circuits, total CRRT time 4530 h). Median circuit survival time with heparin was 21 h (IQR 14.5-27.5) compared to 45.2 h (IQR 37.5-52.8) with citrate (p < 0.001). Actual administered effluent dose compared to prescribed dose was 85% (IQR 69-98%) with heparin compared to 92% (IQR 88-98%) with citrate (p = 0.31). No patient treated with citrate developed citrate toxicity. No other differences in electrolytes were found between the two CRRT regimes. In the heparin group, a median of 6.5 units of red blood cells (IQR 1.5-23.8) were given during CRRT, compared to three in the citrate group (IQR 2.0-5.0, p = 0.12).

conclusionsUse of regional citrate significantly prolongs circuit survival time and thereby should increase CRRT efficiency when compared to heparin. In addition, citrate appears safe for CRRT in critically ill small children.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAnticoagulantsBlood CoagulationChild, PreschoolCitric AcidCritical IllnessFemaleHeparinHumansInfantIntensive Care UnitsMaleProspective StudiesRenal Replacement TherapyTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsCitric AcidHeparinAnticoagulationChildrenCitrateContinuous renal replacement therapyHeparin

Identifiers

PMID28578542
PMCPMC5579151
OpenAlexW2620984419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.