Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28578505›Full record

Observational studyBreast cancer research and treatment2017

Family history and risk of breast cancer: an analysis accounting for family structure.

Hannah R Brewer, Michael E Jones, Minouk J Schoemaker, Alan Ashworth, Anthony J Swerdlow

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 302 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Risk factors for breast cancer in women: an update review.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah R BrewerDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK. Hannah.Brewer@icr.ac.uk.
Michael E JonesDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
Minouk J SchoemakerDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
Alan AshworthDivision of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
Anthony J SwerdlowDivision of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFamily history is an important risk factor for breast cancer incidence, but the parameters conventionally used to categorize it are based solely on numbers and/or ages of breast cancer cases in the family and take no account of the size and age-structure of the woman's family.

methodsUsing data from the Generations Study, a cohort of over 113,000 women from the general UK population, we analyzed breast cancer risk in relation to first-degree family history using a family history score (FHS) that takes account of the expected number of family cases based on the family's age-structure and national cancer incidence rates.

resultsBreast cancer risk increased significantly (P

conclusionsA family history score based on expected as well as observed breast cancers in a family can give greater risk discrimination on breast cancer incidence than conventional parameters based solely on cases in affected relatives. Our modeling suggests that a yet stronger predictor of risk might be a combination of this score and age at diagnosis in relatives.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsMedical History TakingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHeredityHumansIncidenceLikelihood FunctionsMiddle AgedPedigreeBreast cancerCohort studyFamily historyRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID28578505
PMCPMC5511313
OpenAlexW2620638701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.