Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28578483›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2017

SAND: a Screening for Aphasia in NeuroDegeneration. Development and normative data.

Eleonora Catricalà, Elena Gobbi, Petronilla Battista, Antonio Miozzo, Cristina Polito, Veronica Boschi, Valentina Esposito, Sofia Cuoco, Paolo Barone, Sandro Sorbi and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Psychometrics and diagnostics of Italian cognitive screening tests: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Telephone-based cognitive screening in neurodegenerative MCI and dementia: preliminary findings from the TBCS Study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  10. The remote administration of the uniform data set neuropsychological test battery (I-UDSNB) Italian version: normative data.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. "Assessing relationship between blood MAPT methylation levels and clinical expression in Frontotemporal Dementia".Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Eleonora CatricalàNEtS, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS-Pavia, Pavia, Italia. eleonora.catricala@iusspavia.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1622-4415
Elena GobbiUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italia.
Petronilla BattistaNEtS, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS-Pavia, Pavia, Italia.
Antonio MiozzoUnità di Neurologia, Dipartimento di scienze cliniche e sperimentali, Università di Brescia, Brescia, Italia.
Cristina PolitoSBSC - Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Sperimentali e Cliniche, Università di Firenze, Firenze, Italia.
Veronica BoschiNEtS, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS-Pavia, Pavia, Italia.
Valentina EspositoUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italia.
Sofia CuocoFacoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Fisciano, Italia.
Paolo BaroneFacoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Fisciano, Italia.
Sandro SorbiNEUROFARBA- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Psicologia, Area del Farmaco e Salute del Bambino, Università di Firenze, Firenze, Italia.
Stefano F CappaNEtS, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS-Pavia, Pavia, Italia.
Peter GarrardNeuroscience Research Centre, St George's-University of London, London, UK.
Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Salerno · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Brescia · IT

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N025881/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Language assessment has a critical role in the clinical diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases, in particular, in the case of Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). The current diagnostic criteria (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011) identify three main variants on the basis of clinical features and patterns of brain atrophy. Widely accepted tools to diagnose, clinically classify, and follow up the heterogeneous language profiles of PPA are still lacking. In this study, we develop a screening battery, composed of nine tests (picture naming, word and sentence comprehension, word and sentence repetition, reading, semantic association, writing and picture description), following the recommendations of current diagnostic guidelines and taking into account recent research on the topic. All tasks were developed with consideration of the psycholinguistic factors that can affect performance, with the aim of achieving sensitivity to the language deficit to which each task was relevant, and to allow identification of the selective characteristic impairments of each PPA variant. Normative data on 134 Italian subjects pooled across homogeneous subgroups for age, sex, and education are reported. Although further work is still needed, this battery represents a first step towards a concise multilingual standard language examination, a fast and simple tool to help clinicians and researchers in the diagnosis of PPA.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAgedAphasiaComprehensionFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeuropsychological TestsPhotic StimulationReadingReference ValuesRegression AnalysisSemanticsAphasiaLanguage assessmentNeurodegenerative diseasesNormative dataPrimary progressive aphasiaScreening battery

Identifiers

PMID28578483
OpenAlexW2620907673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.