Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28577572›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2017

Using Ellenberg-Pignatti values to estimate habitat preferences of wild food and medicinal plants: an example from northeastern Istria (Croatia).

Ivana Vitasović Kosić, Josip Juračak, Łukasz Łuczaj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. On the Use of the Neglected Edible PlantsPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Traditional Uses ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. An Ethnobotanical Study in Kırşehir (Türkiye).Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Bactericidal Activity of Protein Extracts fromAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ivana Vitasović KosićDepartment of Agricultural Botany, University of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture, Svetošimunska 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Josip JuračakDepartment of Management and Rural Entrepreneurship, University of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture, Svetošimunska 25, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
Łukasz ŁuczajDepartment of Botany, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Rzeszów, Werynia 502, 36-100, Kolbuszowa, Poland. lukasz.luczaj@interia.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5272-4826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe paper presents the first ethnobotanical application of Ellenberg indicator values, which are widely used in European plant ecology. The aim of the study was to find out if Ellenberg values (indicating habitat preferences) differ for wild food and medicinal plants used in north-eastern Istria (Croatia). We used Ellenberg-Pignatti values (the version of Ellenberg values used in this part of Europe).

methodsFifty semi-structured interviews were carried out among local key informants, asking which wild food and medicinal plants they used.

resultsThe mean number of food and medicinal plants mentioned per interview was 30. Altogether, 121 species were recorded as food or medicine used or previously used in the study area. Thirty-one species are used exclusively as food or everyday drink, 50 species are used exclusively as medicine and 40 species are used for both food and medicine. There were no significant differences between Ellenberg values for food and medicinal plants, apart from the Nitrogen indicator value - the plants used exclusively as food had a significantly higher index than those used in medicine. This probably stems from the fact that plants with soft fleshy shoots are attractive as food and they are more likely to come from nitrogen-rich ruderal habitats.

conclusionsFood plants and medicinal plants are collected from a variety of habitats and no clear difference between the two categories of plants was detected, however further testing of Ellenberg values in ethnobotanical studies could be interesting.

Indexed as

EcosystemEthnobotanyPlants, EdiblePlants, MedicinalĆićarijaEllenberg indicator valuesEthnobotanyEthnoecologyEthnomedicineMedicinal plantsPhytoindicationQuantitative ethnobotanyWild edible plants

Identifiers

PMID28577572
PMCPMC5457627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.