Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28577526›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2017

Unplanned pregnancy-risks and use of emergency contraception: a survey of two Nigerian Universities.

Anthony Idowu Ajayi, Ezebunwa Ethelbert Nwokocha, Oladele Vincent Adeniyi, Daniel Ter Goon, Wilson Akpan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anthony Idowu AjayiDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences & Humanities, University of Fort Hare, 50, Church Street, East London, 5201, South Africa. ajayianthony@gmail.com.
Ezebunwa Ethelbert NwokochaDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of the Social Sciences, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Oladele Vincent AdeniyiDepartment of Family Medicine & Rural Health, Walter Sisulu University/Cecilia Makiwane Hospital, East London, South Africa.
Daniel Ter GoonDepartment of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Fort Hare, East London, South Africa.
Wilson AkpanDepartment of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences & Humanities, University of Fort Hare, East London, South Africa.
University of Fort Hare · ZACecilia Makiwane Hospital · ZAUniversity of Ibadan · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe vulnerabilities of young women of low socio-economic status and those with little or no formal education tend to dominate the discourse on unplanned pregnancy, unsafe abortion and emergency contraception (EC) in sub-Saharan Africa. This article draws on a survey conducted among female undergraduate students to shed light on sexual behaviour and the dynamics of emergency contraceptive use among this cohort.

methodsThe survey involved 420 female undergraduate students drawn using a multistage sampling technique, while a self-administered questionnaire was used for data collection. Univariate and bivariate analyses were applied to examine the factors associated with the use of emergency contraception.

resultsOf the 176 female students who reported being sexually active in the year preceding the survey, only 38.6% reported the use of condom during the entire year. Of those who reported unplanned pregnancy anxiety n = 94, about 30.1% used EC, 20.4% used non-EC pills as EC, while others reported having used no EC. A few respondents (n = 3) had terminated a pregnancy under unsafe conditions. Awareness of EC (p < 0.001), knowledge of timing of EC (p = 0.001), perceived risk of unplanned pregnancy (p < 0.001), and level of study (p = 0.013), were significantly correlated with the use of EC.

conclusionThe study revealed that educated youths engaged in high-risk sexual activities and also, sought recourse to unproven and unsafe contraceptive methods. Poor knowledge of EC methods and timing of use, as well as wrong perception about EC side effects, are barriers to the utilisation of EC for the prevention of unplanned pregnancy among the study participants.

Indexed as

Contraception, PostcoitalPregnancy, UnplannedUniversitiesAbortion, InducedAdolescentAdultContraceptives, PostcoitalCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansNigeriaPregnancyRisk AssessmentSexual BehaviorStudentsContraceptives, PostcoitalEmergency contraceptionNon-emergency contraceptionUnplanned pregnancyUnplanned pregnancy-risk perception

Identifiers

PMID28577526
PMCPMC5455101
OpenAlexW2620661902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.