Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28577459›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies2017

Nurse practitioners as primary care providers with their own patient panels and organizational structures: A cross-sectional study.

Lusine Poghosyan, Jianfang Liu, Allison A Norful

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lusine PoghosyanColumbia University School of Nursing, 617 W. 168th Street, GB 219, New York, NY 10032, United States. Electronic address: lp2475@columbia.edu.
Jianfang LiuColumbia University School of Nursing, 617 W. 168th Street, GB 245, New York, NY 10032, United States. Electronic address: jl4029@cumc.columbia.edu.
Allison A NorfulColumbia University School of Nursing, 617 W. 168th Street, GB 239, New York, NY 10032, United States. Electronic address: aan2139@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

Systems Science and Comparative and Cost-Effectiveness Research Training for Nurse Scientists (S2CER2)T32NR014205 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Lusine Poghosyan, Jingjing Shang · 2013 to 2026
$4.2M
Validation of Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Organizational Climate QuestionnairR03HS020999 · AHRQ · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI POGHOSYAN, LUSINE · 2011 to 2012
$100k
AHRQ HHS R03 HS020999NINR NIH HHS T32 NR014205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care systems globally are facing challenges of meeting the growing demand for primary care services due to a shortage of primary care physicians. Policy makers and administrators are searching for solutions to increase the primary care capacity. The effective utilization of nurse practitioners (NPs) has been proposed as a solution. However, organizations utilize NPs in variable capacities. In some settings, NPs serve as primary care providers delivering ongoing continuous care to their patients, referred to as patient panels, whereas in other settings they deliver episodic care. Little is known about why organizations deploy NPs differently.

objectivesInvestigate the NP role in care delivery-primary care providers with the own patient panels or delivering episodic care-within their organizations and understand how work environments affect their role.

designA cross-sectional survey design was used to collect data from primary care NPs. SETTINGS: The study was conducted in one state in the United States (Massachusetts). Data from 163 primary care organizations was obtained, which employed between one to 12 NPs.

participants807 NPs recruited from the Massachusetts Provider Database received mail surveys; 314 completed and returned the survey, yielding a response rate of 40%.

methodsThe survey contained measures of NP role in care delivery and work environment. NP role was measured by an item asking NPs to report if they deliver ongoing continuous care to their patient panel or if they do not have patient panel. The work environment was measured with the Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Organizational Climate Questionnaire (NP-PCOCQ). The multilevel Cox regression models investigated the influence of organization-level work environment on NP role in care delivery.

resultsAbout 45% of NPs served as primary care providers with their own patient panel. Organization-level Independent Practice and Support subscale, an NP-PCOCQ subscale, had a significant positive effect on NP role (risk ratio=2.33; 95% CI: 1.06-5.13); with a one unit increase on this subscale, the incidence of the NPs serving as primary care providers with their own patient panel doubled.

conclusionsNPs can help meet the increasing demand for primary care by taking responsibilities as primary care providers, and organizations can assign NPs their own patient panels. Supporting NP independent practice within organizations promotes NP role as primary care providers. Policy and organizational change focused on promoting NP work environments so NPs can practice as primary care providers can be an effective strategy to increase the primary care capacity.

Indexed as

Nurse-Patient RelationsNurse PractitionersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedNurse's RolePrimary Health CareUnited StatesNurse practitionersPatient panelsPrimary careWork environment

Identifiers

PMID28577459
PMCPMC6342506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.