Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28577369›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2017

Efficacy of a Four-Hour Drainage Clamping Technique in the Reduction of Blood Loss Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Pengfei Zan, Jie J Yao, Lin Fan, Yong Yang, Zifei Zhou, Zhong Wu, Chunyan Zhu, Dong Yang, Guodong Li

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Pengfei ZanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Tenth Peoples' Hospital, Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Jie J YaoMedical School, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Lin FanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Tenth Peoples' Hospital, Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Yong YangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China (mainland).
Zifei ZhouDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Zhong WuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Tenth Peoples' Hospital, Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Chunyan ZhuDepartment of Surgery, The Tenth Peoples' Hospital, Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Dong YangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Tenth Peoples' Hospital, Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Guodong LiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, The Tenth Peoples' Hospital, Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CNTongji University · CNNingxia Medical University · CNShanghai East Hospital · CNThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND During total hip arthroplasty (THA) drainage is used by most surgeons. However, the optimal drainage strategy remains controversial. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine the safety and efficacy of a four-hour drainage clamping technique in patients undergoing THA. MATERIAL AND METHODS There were 64 patients who underwent THA from March 2012 to December 2015 who were enrolled in the study; 32 patients were randomly assigned to four hours of a drainage clamping technique (clamping group); 32 patients were treated with a non-clamping drainage technique (non-clamping group). All perioperative clinical details were recorded for comparative analysis. RESULTS The postoperative drainage volume and calculated blood loss were significantly greater in the drainage non-clamping group, p<0.001 and p=0.028, respectively. Significantly more patients in the drainage non-clamping group required a blood transfusion, seven cases versus one case (p=0.023). Significantly more units of blood were transfused in the drainage non-clamping group (p=0.001). No significant differences were found for all other clinical outcome factors. CONCLUSIONS The four-hour drainage clamping technique following THA, compared with drainage non-clamping technique reduced blood loss and requirement for blood transfusion. There was no increase in adverse clinical events using the four-hour drainage clamping method. Therefore, four-hour drainage clamping has the potential for routine use in THA.

Indexed as

DrainageSurgical InstrumentsAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28577369
PMCPMC5467705
OpenAlexW2620884425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.