Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28577351›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2017

After accounting for competing causes of death and more advanced stage, do Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples with cancer still have worse survival? A population-based cohort study in New South Wales.

Hanna E Tervonen, Richard Walton, Hui You, Deborah Baker, David Roder, David Currow, Sanchia Aranda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hanna E TervonenSchool of Health Sciences, Centre for Population Health Research, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. hanna.tervonen@unisa.edu.au.
Richard WaltonInformation Analysis Unit, Cancer Institute NSW, GPO Box 41, Alexandria, Sydney, NSW, 1435, Australia.
Hui YouInformation Analysis Unit, Cancer Institute NSW, GPO Box 41, Alexandria, Sydney, NSW, 1435, Australia.
Deborah BakerInformation Analysis Unit, Cancer Institute NSW, GPO Box 41, Alexandria, Sydney, NSW, 1435, Australia.
David RoderSchool of Health Sciences, Centre for Population Health Research, University of South Australia, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
David CurrowCancer Institute NSW, GPO Box 41, Alexandria, Sydney, NSW, 1435, Australia.
Sanchia ArandaCancer Institute NSW, GPO Box 41, Alexandria, Sydney, NSW, 1435, Australia.
Cancer Institute of New South Wales · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia have been found to have poorer cancer survival than non-Aboriginal people. However, use of conventional relative survival analyses is limited due to a lack of life tables. This cohort study examined whether poorer survival persist after accounting for competing risks of death from other causes and disparities in cancer stage at diagnosis, for all cancers collectively and by cancer site.

methodsPeople diagnosed in 2000-2008 were extracted from the population-based New South Wales Cancer Registry. Aboriginal status was multiply imputed for people with missing information (12.9%). Logistic regression models were used to compute odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for 'advanced stage' at diagnosis (separately for distant and distant/regional stage). Survival was examined using competing risk regression to compute subhazard ratios (SHRs) with 95%CIs.

resultsOf the 301,356 cases, 2517 (0.84%) identified as Aboriginal (0.94% after imputation). After adjusting for age, sex, year of diagnosis, socio-economic status, remoteness, and cancer site Aboriginal peoples were more likely to be diagnosed with distant (OR 1.30, 95%CI 1.17-1.44) or distant/regional stage (OR 1.29, 95%CI 1.18-1.40) for all cancers collectively. This applied to cancers of the female breast, uterus, prostate, kidney, others (those not included in other categories) and cervix (when analyses were restricted to cases with known stages/known Aboriginal status). Aboriginal peoples had a higher hazard of death than non-Aboriginal people after accounting for competing risks from other causes of death, socio-demographic factors, stage and cancer site (SHR 1.40, 95%CI 1.31-1.50 for all cancers collectively). Consistent results applied to colorectal, lung, breast, prostate and other cancers.

conclusionsAboriginal peoples with cancer have an elevated hazard of cancer death compared with non-Aboriginal people, after accounting for more advanced stage and competing causes of death. Further research is needed to determine reasons, including any contribution of co-morbidity, lifestyle factors and differentials in service access to help explain disparities.

Indexed as

AdultAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesCause of DeathCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingNew South WalesSurvival AnalysisAustraliaEpidemiologyIndigenousNeoplasmsStagingSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID28577351
PMCPMC5457659
OpenAlexW2621064359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.