ReviewHeart failure reviews2017
The role of myocardial viability in contemporary cardiac practice.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Update of the Brazilian Guideline on Nuclear Cardiology - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2020Guideline
- Myocardial Viability: Evolving Insights and Challenges in Revascularization and Functional Recovery.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Coronary artery disease in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Review
- Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Heart Failure.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- The role of cardiac imaging in the management of non-ischemic cardiovascular diseases in human immunodeficiency virus infection.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Article
- Relationship of myocardial hibernation, scar, and angiographic collateral flow in ischemic cardiomyopathy with coronary chronic total occlusion.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019Article
- Personalized Cardiac Computational Models: From Clinical Data to Simulation of Infarct-Related Ventricular Tachycardia.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
- Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: an Update.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2018Review
- Introduction to the Special Issue: Myocardial Imaging in Heart Failure.Heart failure reviews · 2017Article
- Fluorodeoxyglucose Applications in Cardiac PET: Viability, Inflammation, Infection, and Beyond.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic heart disease (IHD) remains the single most common cause of death worldwide. Ischemic cardiomyopathy is a major sequel of coronary artery disease. The economic health burden of IHD is substantial. In patients with old myocardial infarction (OMI), the extent of viable myocardium (VM) directly affects the short- and long-term outcome. There is a considerable collection of observational data showing substantial improvement in patients with significant left ventricular dysfunction when the need for revascularization is guided by preoperative assessment of viability and hibernation. However, a major challenge for present cardiovascular imaging is to identify better ways to assess viable but inadequately perfused myocardium and thus optimize selection of patients for coronary revascularization. Several non-invasive techniques have been developed to detect signs of viability. Hence, our aim is to provide the reader a state-of-the art review for the assessment of myocardial viability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.