Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28577247›Full record

Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2017

Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) with the XL Probe of the Fibroscan

Victor de Lédinghen, Jean-Baptiste Hiriart, Julien Vergniol, Wassil Merrouche, Pierre Bedossa, Valérie Paradis

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Non-invasive assessment of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victor de LédinghenCentre d'Investigation de la Fibrose hépatique, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux, 33604, Pessac, France. victor.deledinghen@chu-bordeaux.fr.
Jean-Baptiste HiriartCentre d'Investigation de la Fibrose hépatique, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux, 33604, Pessac, France.
Julien VergniolCentre d'Investigation de la Fibrose hépatique, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux, 33604, Pessac, France.
Wassil MerroucheCentre d'Investigation de la Fibrose hépatique, Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Bordeaux, 33604, Pessac, France.
Pierre BedossaDepartment of Pathology, Physiology and Imaging, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France.
Valérie ParadisDepartment of Pathology, Physiology and Imaging, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionControlled attenuation parameter (CAP) is a new method for the diagnosis of steatosis. Until now, CAP was available only with the M probe of the Fibroscan. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CAP with the XL probe versus CAP with the M probe, using liver biopsy (LB) as gold standard. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 236 patients with chronic liver disease undergoing LB had CAP measurement with M and XL probes the same day. All LB were analyzed independently by two experienced pathologists.

resultsMedian CAP was 240.5 and 239.5 dB/m with the M and XL probes, respectively. For the detection of steatosis grade with the M and XL probes, AUROCs were 0.82/0.83 for S ≥ 1, 0.89/0.88 for S ≥ 2, and 0.92/0.93 for S3, respectively. Cutoffs were (M and XL probes) 246/242 for S ≥ 1, 269/267 for S ≥ 2, and 285/286 dB/m for S3, respectively. The factor significantly associated with CAP with the M and XL probes was steatosis grade. In multivariate analysis, a low CAP value with XL probe was negatively associated with waist circumference, triglycerides, albumin, and the alcohol consumption, and positively with alkaline phosphatases. In multivariate analysis, a high CAP value with the XL probe was positively associated with waist circumference and triglycerides.

conclusionCAP with the XL probe is a new tool for the diagnosis of steatosis. This parameter could be useful for the diagnosis and the follow-up of obese patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArea Under CurveBiopsyEnd Stage Liver DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMetabolic DiseasesMiddle AgedNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyControlled attenuation parameter (CAP)FibroscanLiver stiffnessMetabolic syndromeNAFLDObesitySteatosisTransient elastography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.