Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28577238›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological physics2017

Dihedral angle preferences of amino acid residues forming various non-local interactions in proteins.

Konda Mani Saravanan, Samuel Selvaraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Konda Mani SaravananCentre of Advanced Study in Crystallography & Biophysics, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 025, India.
Samuel SelvarajCentre of Advanced Study in Crystallography & Biophysics, University of Madras, Guindy Campus, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 025, India. selvarajsamuel@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In theory, a polypeptide chain can adopt a vast number of conformations, each corresponding to a set of backbone rotation angles. Many of these conformations are excluded due to steric overlaps. Ramachandran and coworkers were the first to look into this problem by plotting backbone dihedral angles in a two-dimensional plot. The conformational space in the Ramachandran map is further refined by considering the energetic contributions of various non-bonded interactions. Alternatively, the conformation adopted by a polypeptide chain may also be examined by investigating interactions between the residues. Since the Ramachandran map essentially focuses on local interactions (residues closer in sequence), out of interest, we have analyzed the dihedral angle preferences of residues that make non-local interactions (residues far away in sequence and closer in space) in the folded structures of proteins. The non-local interactions have been grouped into different types such as hydrogen bond, van der Waals interactions between hydrophobic groups, ion pairs (salt bridges), and ππ-stacking interactions. The results show the propensity of amino acid residues in proteins forming local and non-local interactions. Our results point to the vital role of different types of non-local interactions and their effect on dihedral angles in forming secondary and tertiary structural elements to adopt their native fold.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsHydrogen BondingPeptidesProtein BindingProteinsAmino AcidsPeptidesProteinsConformational spaceDihedral angle preferencesInter-residue interactionsLocal and non-local interactionsProtein folding

Identifiers

PMID28577238
PMCPMC5471173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.