ReviewDer Nervenarzt2017
[Search for risk genes in Alzheimer's disease].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of neurodegenerative dementia. The susceptibility to AD is determined by a complex interaction between genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors. Herein, the risk that can be attributed to genetic factors is high (up to 80%). While most AD patients are sporadic, in rare families Mendelian mode of inheritance can be observed. In these rare familial cases, full penetrant mutations have been identified in APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2. Mutations in these three genes are however rarely found in sporadic AD. For over 20 years, the only known genetic risk factor in sporadic AD cases was the APOE-ε4 allele, which increases susceptibility to AD by approximately threefold. Unfortunately, none of these genes explain the frequency of AD. Identification of additional genetic factors was propelled by the advent of genomic approaches such as genome-wide association studies, which has already led to the characterization of 26 novel genetic risk factors. Interestingly, several of these genetic signals cluster in biological pathways including cholesterol, lipid metabolism, immune response, and endocytic trafficking. An additional impulse in genetic research came from the development of novel sequencing technologies. For example, the whole exome sequencing approach has identified an association between the risk of AD and rare coding variants (minor allele frequency <1%) located in genes such as TREM2, SORL1, and ABCA7. Thus, progress from genetic research has significantly increased our understanding of the disease mechanisms operating in AD. However, even though our knowledge of the genetics of sporadic forms of AD has progressed markedly over the last years, it is still far from complete. Additional research is needed to complete the genetic architecture of AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28577227What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.