ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2017
Improved diagnosis and prognostication of patients with pleural malignant mesothelioma using biomarkers in pleural effusions and peripheral blood samples - a short report.
Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diving into the Pleural Fluid: Liquid Biopsy for Metastatic Malignant Pleural Effusions.Cancers · 2021Review
- Total Protein-Chloride Ratio in Pleural Fluid Independently Predicts Overall Survival in Malignant Pleural Effusion at the First Diagnosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Review
- Molecular markers and new diagnostic methods to differentiate malignant from benign mesothelial pleural proliferations: a literature review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThere is a lack of robust and clinically utilizable markers for the diagnosis and prognostication of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). This research was aimed at optimizing and exploring novel approaches to improve the diagnosis and prognostication of MPM in pleural effusions and peripheral blood samples.
methodsCellSearch-based and flow cytometry-based assays using melanoma cell adhesion molecule (MCAM) to identify circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in pleural effusions and peripheral blood samples of MPM patients were optimized, validated, explored clinically and, in case of pleural effusions, compared with cytological analyses. Additionally, tumor-associated circulating endothelial cells (CECs) were measured in peripheral blood samples. The assays were performed on a MPM cohort encompassing patients with histology-confirmed MPM (n=27) and in a control cohort of patients with alternative diagnoses (n=22). Exploratory analyses on the prognostic value of all assays were also performed.
resultsThe malignancy of MCAM-positive cells in pleural effusions from MPM patients was confirmed. The detection of MPM CTCs in pleural effusions by CellSearch showed a poor specificity. The detection of MPM CTCs in pleural effusions by flow cytometry showed a superior sensitivity (48%) to standard cytological analysis (15%) (p = 0.03). In peripheral blood, CTCs were detected in 26% of the MPN patients, whereas in 42% of the MPM patients tumor-associated CECs were detected above the upper limit of normal (ULN). In exploratory analyses the absence of CTCs in pleural effusions, and tumor-associated CECs in peripheral blood samples above the ULN, appeared to be associated with a worse overall survival.
conclusionMCAM-based flow cytometric analysis of pleural effusions is more sensitive than routine cytological analysis. Flow cytometric analysis of pleural effusions and tumor-associated CECs in peripheral blood may serve as a promising approach for the prognostication of MPM patients and, therefore, warrants further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.