Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28577080›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2017

Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK) expression in primary breast cancer correlates with recurrence-free survival and development of bone metastases in I-SPY1 (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657).

Neelima Vidula, Christina Yau, Jiali Li, Laura J Esserman, Hope S Rugo

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Neelima VidulaMassachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. nvidula@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5963-7052
Christina YauUniversity of California, San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero St., San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA.
Jiali LiValley Medical Oncology Consultants, Stanford Health Care, 2505 Hospital Drive, Mountain View, CA, 94040, USA.
Laura J EssermanUniversity of California, San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero St., San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA.
Hope S RugoUniversity of California, San Francisco, 1600 Divisadero St., San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA. Hope.Rugo@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USStanford Health Care · US

Funding

Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK)/RANK ligand (RANKL)/osteoprotegerin (OPG) axis may contribute to the development of bone metastases (BM). We studied gene expression in this pathway in primary breast cancer (BC) to determine correlations with clinical characteristics and outcomes in the neoadjuvant I-SPY1 study.

methodsWe evaluated RANK/RANKL/OPG expression using expression microarrays in I-SPY1 (n = 149). Associations with clinical features were determined using t test and ANOVA. Associations between biomarker high versus low groups (dichotomized at an optimal cutpoint) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated using the log-rank test and in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. A pooled external neoadjuvant cohort with gene expression data (GSE25066) (Hatzis et al. in JAMA 305(18):1873-1881, 30) (n = 425) was used for validation. Associations with site-specific relapse were evaluated using the t-test and multivariate logistic regression adjusting for hormone receptor (HR) status.

resultsRANK was significantly higher in HR negative versus HR positive (p = 0.027), in basal versus non-basal disease (p = 0.004), and in those achieving pathologic complete response (p = 0.038); the associations with HR negative and basal BC were also significant in GSE25066. In both datasets, higher RANK associated with significantly worse RFS (I-SPY1: p = 0.045, GSE25066: p = 0.044). However, this association did not remain significant after adjusting for HR status. In I-SPY1 patients with recurrence, higher RANK correlated with BM versus non-BM (p = 0.045), even after adjusting for HR status (p = 0.035).

conclusionsRANK is increased in HR negative and basal BC, and correlates with worse RFS and risk of BM. The RANK pathway is a potential therapeutic target in BC.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalBiomarkers, TumorBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansLogistic ModelsMastectomyMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoadjuvant TherapyOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOsteoprotegerinBiomarkers, TumorOsteoprotegerinRANK LigandReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa BTNFRSF11A protein, humanTNFRSF11B protein, humanTNFSF11 protein, humanBone metastasesBreast cancerOsteoprotegerin (OPG)RANK ligand (RANKL)Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK)Recurrence-free survival

Identifiers

PMID28577080
PMCPMC5725604
OpenAlexW2620657504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.