Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28577066›Full record

ArticleNeurotoxicity research2017

Comparison of the Psychopharmacological Effects of Tiletamine and Ketamine in Rodents.

Piotr Popik, Małgorzata Hołuj, Tomasz Kos, Gabriel Nowak, Tadeusz Librowski, Kinga Sałat

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotoxicity research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Partial mGluPharmacological reports : PR · 2024
    Article
  5. GM-1020: a novel, orally bioavailable NMDA receptor antagonist with rapid and robust antidepressant-like effects at well-tolerated doses in rodents.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Piotr PopikFaculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 12 Michałowskiego Street, 31-126, Kraków, Poland. nfpopik@cyf-kr.edu.pl.
Małgorzata HołujInstitute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 12 Smętna Street, 31-343, Kraków, Poland.
Tomasz KosInstitute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 12 Smętna Street, 31-343, Kraków, Poland.
Gabriel NowakInstitute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 12 Smętna Street, 31-343, Kraków, Poland. nowak@if-pan.krakow.pl.
Tadeusz LibrowskiFaculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 9 Medyczna Street, 30-688, Kraków, Poland.
Kinga SałatFaculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 9 Medyczna Street, 30-688, Kraków, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PLPolish Academy of Sciences · PLMaj Institute of Pharmacology · PL

Funding

Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College K/ZDS/006281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist ketamine (KET) produces rapid and sustained antidepressant effects in patients. Tiletamine (TIL; 2-ethylamino-2-thiophen-2-yl-cyclohexan-1-one) is another uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist, used in a medical (veterinary) setting as an anesthetic tranquilizer. Here, we compared the behavioral actions of KET and TIL in a variety of tests, focusing on antidepressant-like and dissociative-like effects in mice and rats. The minimum effective doses of KET and TIL were 10 mg/kg to reduce mouse forced swim test immobility and 15 mg/kg to reduce marble-burying behavior. However, at similar doses, both compounds diminished locomotor activity and disturbed learning processes in the mouse passive avoidance test and the rat novel object recognition test. KET and TIL also reduced social behavior and accompanying 50-kHz "happy" ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in rats. TIL (5-15 mg/kg) displayed additional anxiolytic-like effects in the four-plate test. Neither KET nor TIL affected pain response in the hot plate test. Examination of the "side effects" revealed that only at the highest doses investigated did both compounds produce motor deficits in the rotarod test in mice. While KET produced behavioral effects at doses comparable between species, in the rats, TIL was ~10 times more potent than in the mice. In summary, antidepressant-like properties of both KET and TIL are similar, as are their adverse effect liabilities. We suggest that TIL could be an alternative to KET as an antidepressant with an additional anxiolytic-like profile.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Anxiety AgentsAntidepressive AgentsBehavior, AnimalDisease Models, AnimalExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsKetamineMaleMiceMotor ActivityReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateRodentiaTiletamineAnti-Anxiety AgentsAntidepressive AgentsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsKetamineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateTiletamineAntidepressant-like effectsKetamineNMDA receptorTiletamine

Identifiers

PMID28577066
PMCPMC5602060
OpenAlexW2620877976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.