Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28576901›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

AnAnkle Trial study protocol: a randomised trial comparing pain profiles after peripheral nerve block or spinal anaesthesia for ankle fracture surgery.

Rune Sort, Stig Brorson, Ismail Gögenur, Ann Merete Møller

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Management of Pain Associated with Fractures.Current osteoporosis reports · 2020
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [Peripheral nerve block and rebound pain: literature review].Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rune SortDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stig BrorsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ismail GögenurDepartment of Surgery, Centre for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ann Merete MøllerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gentofte Hospital · DKZealand University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnkle fracture surgery is a common procedure, but the influence of anaesthesia choice on postoperative pain and quality of recovery is poorly understood. Some authors suggest a benefit of peripheral nerve block (PNB) in elective procedures, but the different pain profile following acute fracture surgery and the rebound pain on cessation of the PNB both remain unexplored. We present an ongoing randomised study aiming to compare primary PNB anaesthesia with spinal anaesthesia for ankle fracture surgery regarding postoperative pain profiles and quality of recovery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: AnAnkle Trial is a randomised, dual-centre, open-label, blinded analysis trial of 150 adult patients undergoing primary internal fixation of an ankle fracture. Main exclusion criteria are habitual opioid use, impaired pain sensation, other painful injuries or cognitive impairment. The intervention is ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic (20 mL) and saphenal nerve (8 mL) PNB with ropivacaine 7.5 mg/mL, and controls receive spinal anaesthesia (2 mL) with hyperbaric bupivacaine 5 mg/mL. Postoperatively all receive paracetamol, ibuprofen and patient-controlled intravenous morphine on demand. Morphine consumption and pain scores are registered in the first 27 hours and reported as an integrated pain score as the primary endpoint. Pain score intervals are 3 hours and we will use the area under curve to get a longitudinal measure of pain. Secondary outcomes include rebound pain on cessation of anaesthesia, opioid side effects (Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale), quality of recovery (Danish Quality of Recovery-15 score) and pain scores and medication days 1-7 (diary). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Regional Ethics Committees in the Capital Region of Denmark, the Danish Data Protection Agency and the Danish Health and Medical Authority. We will publish the results in international peer-reviewed medical journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: AnAnkle Trial is registered in the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT 2015-001108-76).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAmidesAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthesia, SpinalAnesthetics, LocalAnkle FracturesBupivacaineDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve BlockPain ManagementAmidesAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineRopivacaineankle fracturePeripheral nerve blockpostoperative painrebound painregional anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID28576901
PMCPMC5623423
OpenAlexW2620589415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.