Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28576728›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2017

Cellular circadian oscillators in the suprachiasmatic nucleus remain coupled in the absence of connexin-36.

Tanja Diemer, Dominic Landgraf, Takako Noguchi, Haiyun Pan, Jose L Moreno, David K Welsh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Astrocyte Clocks and Glucose Homeostasis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Circuit development in the master clock network of mammals.The European journal of neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ontogeny of Circadian Rhythms and Synchrony in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tanja DiemerDepartment of Psychiatry and Center for Circadian Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Dominic LandgrafDepartment of Psychiatry and Center for Circadian Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States; Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States. Electronic address: dolandgraf@gmail.com.
Takako NoguchiDepartment of Psychiatry and Center for Circadian Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Haiyun PanDepartment of Psychiatry and Center for Circadian Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Jose L MorenoDepartment of Psychiatry and Center for Circadian Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
David K WelshDepartment of Psychiatry and Center for Circadian Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States; Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States.
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

Circadian Clock Cells: Autonomy Persistence and Calcium DependenceR01MH082945 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI WELSH, DAVID K · 2008 to 2012
$1.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH082945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mammals, the master circadian clock resides in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). The SCN is characterized by robust circadian oscillations of clock gene expression and neuronal firing. The synchronization of circadian oscillations among individual cells in the SCN is attributed to intercellular coupling. Previous studies have shown that gap junctions, specifically those composed of connexin-36 (Cx36) subunits, are required for coupling of electrical firing among SCN neurons at a time scale of milliseconds. However, it remains unknown whether Cx36 gap junctions also contribute to coupling of circadian (∼24h) rhythms of clock gene expression. Here, we investigated circadian expression patterns of the clock gene Period 2 (Per2) in the SCN of Cx36-deficient mice using luminometry and single-cell bioluminescence imaging. Surprisingly, we found that synchronization of circadian PER2 expression rhythms is maintained in SCN explants from Cx36-deficient mice. Since Cx36 expression levels change with age, we also tested circadian running-wheel behavior of juvenile (3-4weeks old) and adult (9-30weeks old) Cx36-deficient mice. We found that impact of connexin-36 expression on circadian behavior changes greatly during postnatal development. However, consistent with the intact synchrony among SCN cells in cultured explants, Cx36-deficient mice had intact locomotor circadian rhythms, although adults displayed a lengthened period in constant darkness. Our data indicate that even though Cx36 may be required for electrical coupling of SCN cells, it does not affect coupling of molecular clock gene rhythms. Thus, electrical coupling of neurons and coupling of circadian clock gene oscillations can be regulated independently in the SCN.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsCircadian ClocksCircadian RhythmConnexinsFemaleGap Junction delta-2 ProteinMaleMice, TransgenicPeriod Circadian ProteinsSuprachiasmatic NucleusTissue Culture TechniquesConnexinsGap Junction delta-2 ProteinPer2 protein, mousePeriod Circadian Proteinscircadianconnexin-36couplinggap junctionsSCN

Identifiers

PMID28576728
PMCPMC5556374
OpenAlexW2617494591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.