Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28576675›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2017

Buparlisib plus fulvestrant versus placebo plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (BELLE-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

José Baselga, Seock-Ah Im, Hiroji Iwata, Javier Cortés, Michele De Laurentiis, Zefei Jiang, Carlos L Arteaga, Walter Jonat, Mark Clemons, Yoshinori Ito and 15 more

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 293 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
293citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
58.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01610284 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Randomized, Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study of BKM120 With Fulvestrant, in Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-positive HER2-negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Which Progressed on or After Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2012 to 2019Enrolled1,147ConditionsBreast CancerArmsFulvestrant, BKM120, BKM120 matching placebo
NCT05181033 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Phase II Randomized Trial of Lenvatinib Combined With Letrozole Versus Fulvestrant in Metastatic Estrogen Receptor (ER) Positive, HER2 Negative Breast Cancer, Who Have Progressed on First-line Aromatase Inhibitor + a CDK4/6 Inhibitor.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University Hospital, SingaporeRan2021 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsBreast CancerArmsLenvatinib + Letrozole, Fulvestrant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

293 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 535 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Significance of phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors in advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. The Predictive Role ofBioMed research international · 2020
    Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Duvelisib with Docetaxel for Patients with Anti-PD-1 Refractory, Recurrent, or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Clinical and Biomarker Results from Phase I/II Study of PI3K Inhibitor Alpelisib plus Nab-paclitaxel in HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial

233 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.

José BaselgaDepartment of Medicine and Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: baselgaj@mskcc.org.
Seock-Ah ImDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Hiroji IwataDepartment of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Javier CortésDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Instituto Oncológico Baselga, Hospital Quirónsalud, Barcelona, Spain.
Michele De LaurentiisDepartment of Breast Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumouri Fondazione G Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Zefei JiangDepartment of Breast Cancer, Beijing 307 Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China.
Carlos L ArteagaDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Walter JonatDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Mark ClemonsDivision of Medical Oncology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Yoshinori ItoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Ahmad AwadaMedicine Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Stephen ChiaDepartment of Medicine, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Agnieszka Jagiełło-GruszfeldDepartment of Breast Cancer and Reconstruction Surgery, Maria Skłodowska Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Barbara PistilliDepartment of Oncology, Ospedale di Macerata, Macerata, Italy.
Ling-Ming TsengDepartment of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sara HurvitzDivision of Haematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Norikazu MasudaBreast Oncology, Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Masato TakahashiDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan.
Peter VuylstekeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL, Namur, Belgium.
Soulef HachemiNovartis Pharma SAS, Paris, France.
Bharani DharanNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Emmanuelle Di TomasoSyros Pharmaceuticals, Watertown, MA, USA.
Patrick UrbanNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Cristian MassacesiNovartis Pharma SAS, Paris, France.
Mario CamponeInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest-René Gauducheau Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie, Nantes, France.
Novartis (France) · FR307th Hospital of Chinese People’s Liberation Army · CNAichi Cancer Center · JPBC Cancer Agency · CAHospital Quirónsalud Barcelona · ESInstitut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest · FRInstitut Jules Bordet · BEIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHNovartis (United States) · USOsaka National Hospital · JPOttawa Hospital · CASapporo National Hospital · JPSeoul National University Hospital · KRTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TWThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLUCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterUCLouvain · BE

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway activation is a hallmark of endocrine therapy-resistant, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. This phase 3 study assessed the efficacy of the pan-PI3K inhibitor buparlisib plus fulvestrant in patients with advanced breast cancer, including an evaluation of the PI3K pathway activation status as a biomarker for clinical benefit.

methodsThe BELLE-2 trial was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study. Postmenopausal women aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed, hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor (HER2)-negative inoperable locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer whose disease had progressed on or after aromatase inhibitor treatment and had received up to one previous line of chemotherapy for advanced disease were included. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using interactive voice response technology (block size of 6) on day 15 of cycle 1 to receive oral buparlisib (100 mg/day) or matching placebo, starting on day 15 of cycle 1, plus intramuscular fulvestrant (500 mg) on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1, and on day 1 of subsequent 28-day cycles. Patients were assigned randomisation numbers with a validated interactive response technology; these numbers were linked to different treatment groups which in turn were linked to treatment numbers. PI3K status in tumour tissue was determined via central laboratory during a 14-day run-in phase. Randomisation was stratified by PI3K pathway activation status (activated vs non-activated vs and unknown) and visceral disease status (present vs absent). Patients, investigators, local radiologists, study team, and anyone involved in the study were masked to the identity of the treatment until unblinding. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival by local investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (version 1.1) in the total population, in patients with known (activated or non-activated) PI3K pathway status, and in PI3K pathway-activated patients. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment according to the treatment they received. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01610284, and is currently ongoing but not recruiting participants.

findingsBetween Sept 7, 2012, and Sept 10, 2014, 1147 patients from 267 centres in 29 countries were randomly assigned to receive buparlisib (n=576) or placebo plus fulvestrant (n=571). In the total patient population (n=1147), median progression-free survival was 6·9 months (95% CI 6·8-7·8) in the buparlisib group versus 5·0 months (4·0-5·2) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·78 [95% CI 0·67-0·89]; one-sided p=0·00021). In patients with known PI3K status (n=851), median progression-free survival was 6·8 months (95% CI 5·0-7·0) in the buparlisib group vs 4·5 months (3·3-5·0) in the placebo group (HR 0·80 [95% CI 0·68-0·94]; one-sided p=0·0033). In PI3K pathway-activated patients (n=372), median progression-free survival was 6·8 months (95% CI 4·9-7·1) in the buparlisib group versus 4·0 months (3·1-5·2) in the placebo group (HR 0·76 [0·60-0·97], one-sided p=0·014). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the buparlisib group versus the placebo group were increased alanine aminotransferase (146 [25%] of 573 patients vs six [1%] of 570), increased aspartate aminotransferase (103 [18%] vs 16 [3%]), hyperglycaemia (88 [15%] vs one [<1%]), and rash (45 [8%] vs none). Serious adverse events were reported in 134 (23%) of 573 patients in the buparlisib group compared with 90 [16%] of 570 patients in the placebo group; the most common serious adverse events (affecting ≥2% of patients) were increased alanine aminotransferase (17 [3%] of 573 vs one [<1%] of 570) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (14 [2%] vs one [<1%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

interpretationThe results from this study show that PI3K inhibition combined with endocrine therapy is effective in postmenopausal women with endocrine-resistant, hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Use of more selective PI3K inhibitors, such as α-specific PI3K inhibitor, is warranted to further improve safety and benefit in this setting. No further studies are being pursued because of the toxicity associated with this combination.

fundingNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Indexed as

AgedAlanine TransaminaseAminopyridinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAspartate AminotransferasesBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesDisease-Free SurvivalDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA, NeoplasmDouble-Blind MethodDrug EruptionsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstradiolExanthemaAlanine TransaminaseAminopyridinesAspartate AminotransferasesBiomarkers, TumorClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesDNA, NeoplasmERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstradiolFulvestrantMorpholinesNVP-BKM120Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPIK3CA protein, humanReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID28576675
PMCPMC5549667
OpenAlexW2619858681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.