Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28576567›Full record

ReviewExperimental neurology2017

Developing a data sharing community for spinal cord injury research.

Alison Callahan, Kim D Anderson, Michael S Beattie, John L Bixby, Adam R Ferguson, Karim Fouad, Lyn B Jakeman, Jessica L Nielson, Phillip G Popovich, Jan M Schwab and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The Life of a Trailing Spouse.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alison CallahanStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford 94305, CA, USA. Electronic address: acallaha@stanford.edu.
Kim D AndersonMiami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami 33136, FL, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami 33136, FL, USA.
Michael S BeattieUCSF Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco 94110, CA, USA.
John L BixbyMiami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami 33136, FL, USA; Center for Computational Science, University of Miami, Coral Gables 33146, FL, USA; Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami 33136, FL, USA.
Adam R FergusonUCSF Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco 94110, CA, USA; San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco 94121, CA, USA.
Karim FouadDepartment of Physical Therapy, Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G2G4, Alberta, Canada.
Lyn B JakemanNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, The National Institutes of Health, Rockville 20852, MD, USA.
Jessica L NielsonUCSF Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco 94110, CA, USA; San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco 94121, CA, USA.
Phillip G PopovichCenter for Brain and Spinal Cord Repair, The Neurological Institute, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus 43210, OH, USA; Department of Neuroscience, The Neurological Institute, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus 43210, OH, USA.
Jan M SchwabDepartment of Neuroscience, The Neurological Institute, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus 43210, OH, USA; Department of Neurology, The Neurological Institute, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus 43210, OH, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Neurological Institute, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus 43210, OH, USA.
Vance P LemmonMiami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami 33136, FL, USA; Center for Computational Science, University of Miami, Coral Gables 33146, FL, USA. Electronic address: VLemmon@med.miami.edu.
FAIR Share Workshop Participants

Funding

Regenbase: A Searchable Database to Organize Regeneration Knowledge via OntologieR01NS080145 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BIXBY, JOHN L, LEMMON, VANCE P · 2012 to 2015
$2.3M
Bioinformatics For Translational Spinal Cord Injury ResearchR01NS067092 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FERGUSON, ADAM R · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS067092NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS080145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid growth in data sharing presents new opportunities across the spectrum of biomedical research. Global efforts are underway to develop practical guidance for implementation of data sharing and open data resources. These include the recent recommendation of 'FAIR Data Principles', which assert that if data is to have broad scientific value, then digital representations of that data should be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR). The spinal cord injury (SCI) research field has a long history of collaborative initiatives that include sharing of preclinical research models and outcome measures. In addition, new tools and resources are being developed by the SCI research community to enhance opportunities for data sharing and access. With this in mind, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) hosted a workshop on October 5-6, 2016 in Bethesda, MD, in collaboration with the Open Data Commons for Spinal Cord Injury (ODC-SCI) titled "Preclinical SCI Data: Creating a FAIR Share Community". Workshop invitees were nominated by the workshop steering committee (co-chairs: ARF and VPL; members: AC, KDA, MSB, KF, LBJ, PGP, JMS), to bring together junior and senior level experts including preclinical and basic SCI researchers from academia and industry, data science and bioinformatics experts, investigators with expertise in other neurological disease fields, clinical researchers, members of the SCI community, and program staff representing federal and private funding agencies. The workshop and ODC-SCI efforts were sponsored by the International Spinal Research Trust (ISRT), the Rick Hansen Institute, Wings for Life, the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation and NINDS. The number of attendees was limited to ensure active participation and feedback in small groups. The goals were to examine the current landscape for data sharing in SCI research and provide a path to its future. Below are highlights from the workshop, including perspectives on the value of data sharing in SCI research, workshop participant perspectives and concerns, descriptions of existing resources and actionable directions for further engaging the SCI research community in a model that may be applicable to many other areas of neuroscience. This manuscript is intended to share these initial findings with the broader research community, and to provide talking points for continued feedback from the SCI field, as it continues to move forward in the age of data sharing.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationResearchHumansNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U.S.)Spinal Cord InjuriesUnited StatesFAIR data principlesInformaticsNeuroscienceOpen Data CommonsReproducibilityWorkshop proceedings

Identifiers

PMID28576567
PMCPMC6448396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.