ReviewClinics in plastic surgery2017
Disaster Preparedness and Response for the Burn Mass Casualty Incident in the Twenty-first Century.
Review in Clinics in plastic surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Actionable, Revised (v.3), and Amplified American Burn Association Triage Tables for Mass Casualties: A Civilian Defense Guideline.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2020Guideline
- Resource Requirements in a Burn Mass Casualty Event.European burn journal · 2024Article
- Feasibility and Acceptability of a Model Disaster Teleconsultation System for Regional Disaster Health Response.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2023Article
- A 1% TBSA Chart Reduces Math Errors While Retaining Acceptable First-Estimate Accuracy.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022Article
- Burns incident responses worldwide and the role of burn speciality teams: a review.International journal of burns and trauma · 2022Review
- Assessment of the Capacity and Capability of Burn Centers to Respond to Burn Disasters in Belgium: A Mixed-Method Study.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2019Article
- The crowd-out effect of a mass casualty incident: Experience from a dust explosion with multiple burn injuries.Medicine · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effective and efficient coordination of emergent patient care at the point of injury followed by the systematic resource-based triage of casualties are the most critical factors that influence patient outcomes after mass casualty incidents (MCIs). The effectiveness and appropriateness of implemented actions are largely determined by the extent and efficacy of the planning and preparation that occur before the MCI. The goal of this work was to define the essential efforts related to planning, preparation, and execution of acute and subacute medical care for disaster burn casualties. This type of MCI is frequently referred to as a burn MCI."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.