Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28575919›Full record

SynthesisRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2017

Zika Virus Infection in Pregnant Women and Microcephaly.

Geraldo Duarte, Antonio Fernandes Moron, Artur Timerman, César Eduardo Fernandes, Corintio Mariani Neto, Gutemberg Leão de Almeida Filho, Heron Werner Junior, Hilka Flavia Barra do Espírito Santo, João Alfredo Piffero Steibel, João Bortoletti Filho and 9 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment protocol of dengue during pregnancy and the postpartum period.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. sEVsMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Article
  12. Dual-fluorescent reporter for live-cell imaging of the ER during DENV infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Brazilian Protocol for Sexually Transmitted Infections 2020: Zika virus infection.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Geraldo DuarteUniversidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Antonio Fernandes MoronUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Artur TimermanHospital Professor Edmundo Vasconcelos, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
César Eduardo FernandesFaculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil.
Corintio Mariani NetoHospital Maternidade Leonor Mendes de Barros, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Gutemberg Leão de Almeida FilhoUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Heron Werner JuniorAlta Excelência Diagnóstica, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Hilka Flavia Barra do Espírito SantoUniversidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, AM, Brazil.
João Alfredo Piffero SteibelPontifícia Universidade Católica, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
João Bortoletti FilhoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Juvenal Barreto Borriello de AndradeConsultório Médico Juvenal Barreto Borriello de Andrade, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Marcelo BurláClínica Marcelo Burlá, Rio de Janeiro, RJ Brazil.
Marcos Felipe Silva de SáUniversidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Newton Eduardo BussoFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Paulo César GiraldoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Renato Augusto Moreira de SáUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.
Renato Passini JuniorUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Rosiane MattarUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rossana Pulcineli Vieira FranciscoUniversidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRCentro de Excelência em Bioinformática · BRFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo · BRFaculdade de Medicina do ABC · BRHospital Geral de Bonsucesso · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal do Amazonas · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From the discovery of the Zika virus (ZIKV) in 1947 in Uganda (Africa), until its arrival in South America, it was not known that it would affect human reproductive life so severely. Today, damage to the central nervous system is known to be multiple, and microcephaly is considered the tip of the iceberg. Microcephaly actually represents the epilogue of this infection's devastating process on the central nervous system of embryos and fetuses. As a result of central nervous system aggression by the ZIKV, this infection brings the possibility of arthrogryposis, dysphagia, deafness and visual impairment. All of these changes of varying severity directly or indirectly compromise the future life of these children, and are already considered a congenital syndrome linked to the ZIKV. Diagnosis is one of the main difficulties in the approach of this infection. Considering the clinical part, it has manifestations common to infections by the dengue virus and the chikungunya fever, varying only in subjective intensities. The most frequent clinical variables are rash, febrile state, non-purulent conjunctivitis and arthralgia, among others. In terms of laboratory resources, there are also limitations to the subsidiary diagnosis. Molecular biology tests are based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with reverse transcriptase (RT) action, since the ZIKV is a ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus. The RT-PCR shows serum or plasma positivity for a short period of time, no more than five days after the onset of the signs and symptoms. The ZIKV urine test is positive for a longer period, up to 14 days. There are still no reliable techniques for the serological diagnosis of this infection. If there are no complications (meningoencephalitis or Guillain-Barré syndrome), further examination is unnecessary to assess systemic impairment. However, evidence is needed to rule out other infections that also cause rashes, such as dengue, chikungunya, syphilis, toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus, rubella, and herpes. There is no specific antiviral therapy against ZIKV, and the therapeutic approach to infected pregnant women is limited to the use of antipyretics and analgesics. Anti-inflammatory drugs should be avoided until the diagnosis of dengue is discarded. There is no need to modify the schedule of prenatal visits for pregnant women infected by ZIKV, but it is necessary to guarantee three ultrasound examinations during pregnancy for low-risk pregnancies, and monthly for pregnant women with confirmed ZIKV infection. Vaginal delivery and natural breastfeeding are advised.

Indexed as

Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousZika Virus InfectionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMicrocephalyPregnancyPrenatal Care

Identifiers

PMID28575919
PMCPMC10316959
OpenAlexW2620609073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.