ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2017
Biomaterials for skeletal muscle tissue engineering.
Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
84 citing papers in PubMed.
- Muscle-fiber-inspired nanofibrillar microbundles induce myogenic differentiation in human adipose-derived stem cells.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Traditional Chinese Medicine for Diabetic Sarcopenia: A Review and Its Related Mechanisms.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Review
- Nano Biomaterials in Drug Delivery and Tissue Engineering.Current drug delivery · 2026Review
- Properties of 3-Dimensional Cell Cultivation Matrices and Scaffolds in Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 Tesla.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Electrical Stimulation Therapy - Dedicated to the Perfect Plastic Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Astragaloside IV Improves Muscle Atrophy by Modulating the Activity of UPS and ALP via Suppressing Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Denervated Mice.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Article
- Freeze-Dried Porous Collagen Scaffolds for the Repair of Volumetric Muscle Loss Injuries.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Article
- Regenerative potential of immune cells after traumatic muscle injury.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Advances in treatment and repair technologies for exercise-induced skeletal muscle injuries.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Review
- Extraction, content determination, component analysis, and pharmacological action of Hedysari flavonoids: a review of research progress.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Engineered nanofibrillar collagen with tunable biophysical properties for myogenic, endothelial, and osteogenic cell guidance.Acta biomaterialia · 2024Article
- Freeze-dried porous collagen scaffolds for the repair of volumetric muscle loss injuries.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Wireless Magnetic Robot for Precise Hierarchical Control of Tissue Deformation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Citric Acid: A Nexus Between Cellular Mechanisms and Biomaterial Innovations.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2024Review
- VEGF-delivering PEG hydrogels promote vascularization in the porcine subcutaneous space.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2024Article
- Fabrication of fully aligned self-assembled cell-laden collagen filaments for tissue engineeringBioactive materials · 2024Article
- Edible mycelium as proliferation and differentiation support for anchorage-dependent animal cells in cultivated meat production.NPJ science of food · 2024Article
- Emerging Therapeutic Strategies in Sarcopenia: An Updated Review on Pathogenesis and Treatment Advances.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Three-Dimensional Microfibrous Scaffold with Aligned Topography Produced via a Combination of Melt-Extrusion Additive Manufacturing and Porogen Leaching for In Vitro Skeletal Muscle Modeling.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Structural DNA nanotechnology at the nexus of next-generation bio-applications: challenges and perspectives.Nanoscale advances · 2024Review
24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although skeletal muscle can naturally regenerate in response to minor injuries, more severe damage and myopathies can cause irreversible loss of muscle mass and function. Cell therapies, while promising, have not yet demonstrated consistent benefit, likely due to poor survival of delivered cells. Biomaterials can improve muscle regeneration by presenting chemical and physical cues to muscle cells that mimic the natural cascade of regeneration. This brief review describes strategies for muscle repair utilizing biomaterials that can provide signals to either transplanted or host muscle cells. These strategies range from approaches that utilize biomaterials alone to those that combine biomaterials with exogenous growth factors, ex vivo cultured cells, and extensive culture time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.