ArticleNeurosurgery2018
Safety and Efficacy of a Novel, Self-Adhering Dural Substitute in a Canine Supratentorial Durotomy Model.
Article in Neurosurgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Evaluation of Different Commercial Sealing Hemostatic Patches for Their Selection as Reservoirs for Localized Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
- Application of collagen matrix (DuraGenThe Journal of veterinary medical science · 2024Article
- A low-swelling hydrogel as a multirole sealant for efficient dural defect sealing and prevention of postoperative adhesion.National science review · 2024Article
- Does Early Mobilization Following Resection of Spinal Intra-Dural Pathology Increase the Risk of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks?-A Dual-Center Comparative Effectiveness Research.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Safety and biodegradability of a synthetic dural sealant patch (Liqoseal) in a porcine cranial model.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2021Article
- Histologic Comparison of the Dura Mater among Species.Comparative medicine · 2020Article
- Case Report of a Novel Technique for Repair of the Vertebral Artery During Cranial Surgery.Neurology and therapy · 2019Article
- On-site fabrication of Bi-layered adhesive mesenchymal stromal cell-dressings for the treatment of heart failure.Biomaterials · 2019Article
- Article
- Neuroprotective Effects of Collagen-Glycosaminoglycan Matrix Implantation following Surgical Brain Injury.Mediators of inflammation · 2019Article
- Properties of collagen-based hemostatic patch compared to oxidized cellulose-based patch.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2018Article
- Biosubstitutes for dural closure: Unveiling research, application, and future prospects of dura mater alternatives.Journal of tissue engineeringReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks increase postoperative risk for complication, likelihood of reoperation, and costs.
objectiveTo investigate a novel, self-adhering polyethylene glycol-coated collagen pad (PCC) as a dural substitute relative to Duragen XS (DGX; Integra LifeSciences Corporation, Plainsboro, New Jersey) and as a dural sealant relative to Tachosil (Takeda Austria GmbH, Linz, Austria), a fibrinogen and thrombin-coated collagen pad (FTC).
methodsA canine supratentorial durotomy surgical model was used to investigate the safety and efficacy of PCC. For safety, 4 animals were bilaterally treated with DGX or PCC and recovered for 1, 8, or 16 wk; total 24 animals. Each animal underwent physical and neurological examinations weekly and 16-wk animals underwent a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination at each time point. For efficacy, 9 animals were unilaterally treated with FTC or PCC and underwent a burst pressure test intraoperatively or 14 d postoperatively; total 36 animals.
resultsIn the safety study, no abnormal clinical signs or changes were noted on physical and neurological examinations, or in clinical pathology, CSF analysis or histopathology of DGX or PCC-treated animals. No consistent signs of cerebral compression, CSF leak, hemorrhage, or hydrocephalus were noted on MRI. In the efficacy study, no significant difference was found between FTC and PCC at each time point or overall (13.9 vs 12.3 mm Hg, n = 18 per group, P = .46).
conclusionPCC is safe for use as a dural substitute and effective as a dural sealant. The novel, self-adhering combination of a polyethylene glycol-based sealant and a collagen pad may offer unique benefits to the advancement of duraplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.