Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28575157›Full record

ReviewThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2018

Sex Differences in Aging: Genomic Instability.

Kathleen E Fischer, Nicole C Riddle

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Robust Metabolomic Age Prediction Based on a Wide Selection of Metabolites.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Molecular mechanisms of aging and anti-aging strategies.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kathleen E FischerDepartment of Biology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Nicole C RiddleDepartment of Biology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Funding

Sex hormones and arthritis in a long lived animal modelP30AG050886 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI DAVID B ALLISON · 2015 to 2026
$11.3M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG050886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging is characterized by decreasing physiological integration, reduced function, loss of resilience, and increased risk of death. Paradoxically, although women live longer, they suffer greater morbidity particularly late in life. These sex differences in human lifespan and healthspan are consistently observed in all countries and during every era for which reliable data exist. While these differences are ubiquitous in humans, evidence of sex differences in longevity and health for other species is more equivocal. Among fruit flies, nematodes, and mice, sex differences in lifespan vary depending on strain and treatment. In this review, we focus on sex differences in age-related alterations in DNA damage and mutation rates, telomere attrition, epigenetics, and nuclear architecture. We find that robust sex differences exist, eg, the higher incidence of DNA damage in men compared to women, but sex differences are not often conserved between species. For most mechanisms reviewed here, there are insufficient data to make a clear determination regarding the impact of sex, largely because sex differences have not been analyzed. Overall, our findings reveal an urgent need for well-designed studies that explicitly examine sex differences in molecular drivers of aging.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAgingAnimalsCell NucleusDNA DamageEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleHumansMaleMutation RateTelomere ShorteningDNA damageEpigeneticsGenderSenescenceTelomeres

Identifiers

PMID28575157
PMCPMC5861920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.