ArticlePloS one2017
Adverse drug events-Analysis of a decade. A Portuguese case-study, from 2004 to 2013 using hospital database.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hospitalizations and deaths related to adverse drug events worldwide: Systematic review of studies with national coverage.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Adverse drug reactions in hospitals: population estimates for Portugal and the ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM crosswalk.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Reporting Antimicrobial-Related Adverse Drug Events in Jordan: An Analysis from the VigiBase Database.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Analysis of Adverse Drug Reaction Reports from a Public Hospital in Shanxi Province in 2022.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
- Contributions to the Portuguese National Plan for Patient Safety 2021-2026: A Robust Methodology Based on the Mixed-Method Approach.Portuguese journal of public health · 2022Article
- Hospitalizations and adverse drug events in the Brazilian unified health system: a ten-year retrospective analysis of routine data.Revista de saude publica · 2022Article
- Pharmacological Interactions in the Elderly.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Review
- Personalising drug safety-results from the multi-centre prospective observational study on Adverse Drug Reactions in Emergency Departments (ADRED).European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2020Observational
- Healthcare professionals' pharmacovigilance knowledge and adverse drug reaction reporting behavior and factors determining the reporting rates.Journal of drug assessment · 2019Article
- Nursing technicians' professional training in patient safety: A mixed-methods study.Revista latino-americana de enfermagemArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe goal of this study was to characterise adverse drug events (ADE), including both adverse drug reaction (ADR) and accidental poisoning by drugs (AP), considering age, gender, length of stay (LOS), number of deaths and year, during the period 2004-2013. Additionally distributions of the ten's most frequent ADR and AP were characterized, considering age-group and gender.
methodsA retrospective descriptive nationwide study was conducted, based on the hospital discharges database in Portugal from 2004 to 2013, using ICD-9. Events were identified based on the following codes: from E930 to E949.9 and from E850 to E858.9.
resultsA total of 9 320 076 patients were discharged within this period, with 133 688 patients (1.46%) having at least one ADE, 4% of them related with AP. The mean age of these patients was 63.79 years (SD 21.31), 54.50% were female and the mean LOS was 14.05 days (SD 22.19). Patient with AP had a mean age of 41.06 years (SD 34.05), 54.70% were female and LOS was 7.15 days (SD 19.42). We have identified 10.691 deaths that represent 8.00% from the total of patients with an ADE. The patients above 65 years were more affected by ADR and children below 18 were more affected by AP.
conclusionIn the last decade an increasing trend of ADR were observed and an AP pattern relatively stable. Elderly people and children were the age groups most affected. Antibiotics (in ADR) and benzodiazepine-based tranquilizers (in AP) were the major problems. This is a huge, increasing and challenging problem. Further research, using individual and contextual risk factors should be developed to understand spatiotemporal variability, promoting tailored interventions, within and across countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.