Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28574997›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Attenuation of postoperative adhesions using a modeled manual therapy.

Geoffrey M Bove, Susan L Chapelle, Katherine E Hanlon, Michael P Diamond, David J Mokler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Geoffrey M BoveUniversity of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Stella Maris 102 Biddeford ME, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8974-4705
Susan L ChapelleSquamish Integrated Health, Cleveland.Squamish, BC, CANADA.
Katherine E HanlonUniversity of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Stella Maris 102 Biddeford ME, United States of America.
Michael P DiamondMedical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Augusta, GA United States of America.
David J MoklerUniversity of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Stella Maris 102 Biddeford ME, United States of America.
New England College · USAugusta University · US

Funding

Abdominal Massage for Postoperative Adhesions and IleusR01GM108041 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND · PI BOVE, GEOFFREY M · 2013 to 2015
$790k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative adhesions are pathological attachments that develop between abdominopelvic structures following surgery. Considered unavoidable and ubiquitous, postoperative adhesions lead to bowel obstructions, infertility, pain, and reoperations. As such, they represent a substantial health care challenge. Despite over a century of research, no preventive treatment exists. We hypothesized that postoperative adhesions develop from a lack of movement of the abdominopelvic organs in the immediate postoperative period while rendered immobile by surgery and opiates, and tested whether manual therapy would prevent their development. In a modified rat cecal abrasion model, rats were allocated to receive treatment with manual therapy or not, and their resulting adhesions were quantified. We also characterized macrophage phenotype. In separate experiments we tested the safety of the treatment on a strictureplasty model, and also the efficacy of the treatment following adhesiolysis. We show that the treatment led to reduced frequency and size of cohesive adhesions, but not other types of adhesions, such as those involving intraperitoneal fatty structures. This effect was associated with a delay in the appearance of trophic macrophages. The treatment did not inhibit healing or induce undesirable complications following strictureplasty. Our results support that that maintained movements of damaged structures in the immediate postoperative period has potential to act as an effective preventive for attenuating cohesive postoperative adhesion development. Our findings lay the groundwork for further research, including mechanical and pharmacologic approaches to maintain movements during healing.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal ManipulationsAnimalsFemalePostoperative ComplicationsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTissue Adhesions

Identifiers

PMID28574997
PMCPMC5456066
OpenAlexW2621052720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.