Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28574818›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Characterization of the release and biological significance of cell-free DNA from breast cancer cell lines.

Wei Wang, Peng Kong, Ge Ma, Li Li, Jin Zhu, Tiansong Xia, Hui Xie, Wenbin Zhou, Shui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. TLR9: A Double-Dealing Toll-Like Receptor.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wei WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Peng KongDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Ge MaDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Li LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Jin ZhuDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Tiansong XiaDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Hui XieDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Wenbin ZhouDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Shui WangDepartment of Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In breast cancer, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been proven to be a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker. However, there have been few studies on the origin and biological significance of cfDNA. In this study, we assessed the release pattern of cfDNA from breast cancer cell lines under different culture conditions and investigated the biological significance of cfDNA. The cfDNA concentration increased rapidly (6 h) after passage, decreased gradually, and was then maintained at a relatively stable level after 24 h. In addition, the cfDNA concentration did not correlate with the amount of apoptotic and necrotic cells. Interestingly, if more cells were in the G1 phase, more cfDNA was detected (p < 0.01) and the cfDNA concentration correlated positively with the percent of cells in the G1 phase (p < 0.05). We observed that cells could release cfDNA actively, but not exclusively, via exosomes. Furthermore, we showed that cfDNA could stimulate hormone receptor-positive breast cancer cell proliferation by activating the TLR9-NF-κB-cyclin D1 pathway. In conclusion, cfDNA is released from breast cancer mainly by active secretion, and cfDNA could stimulate proliferation of breast cancer cells.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCell Line, TumorDNA, NeoplasmFemaleHumansBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA, Neoplasmbiological significancebreast cancercell-free DNAcirculating tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID28574818
PMCPMC5522137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.