Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28574752›Full record

ArticleJournal of athletic training2017

Athletic Trainers' Perceptions of and Barriers to Patient Care Documentation: A Report From the Athletic Training Practice-Based Research Network.

Cailee E Welch Bacon, Bradly L Eppelheimer, Tricia M Kasamatsu, Kenneth C Lam, Sara L Nottingham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of athletic training, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Athletic Trainer's Varying Levels of Awareness and Use of Disablement Model Frameworks: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Validation of a Script to Facilitate Social Determinant of Health Conversations with Adolescent Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cailee E Welch BaconA.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ.
Bradly L EppelheimerIndiana University, Bloomington.
Tricia M KasamatsuCalifornia State University, Fullerton.
Kenneth C LamA.T. Still University, Mesa, AZ.
Sara L NottinghamChapman University, Orange, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextFor the practice characteristics of the services athletic trainers (ATs) provide to be identified, all ATs must complete high-quality patient care documentation. However, little is known about ATs' perceptions of patient care documentation or the potential barriers they may encounter while trying to ensure high-quality documentation.

objectiveTo explore ATs' perceptions of and barriers to patient care documentation via the Clinical Outcomes Research Education for Athletic Trainers (CORE-AT) electronic medical record system in the secondary school setting.

designQualitative study.

settingIndividual telephone interviews. PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsWe interviewed 10 ATs (4 men, 6 women; age = 32.6 ± 11.4 years, athletic training experience = 7.1 ± 7.8 years) who were members of the Athletic Training Practice-Based Research Network (AT-PBRN) and employed in the secondary school setting. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We conducted an individual interview with each participant. After transcription of the interviews, the data were analyzed into common themes and categories following the consensual qualitative research tradition. Data triangulation occurred through member checking and multiple researchers to ensure accuracy during data analysis.

resultsParticipants revealed several perceptions of patient care documentation, consisting of quality, expectations and accountability, priority, incentive, and culture of the secondary school setting. In addition, we identified barriers to quality patient care documentation: lack of time, lack of accountability for documenting patient care, inadequate facility resources, and lack of personnel. Participants discussed the volume of patients as a unique challenge in the secondary school setting.

conclusionsWhereas ATs perceived patient care documentation as important, several practical barriers may inhibit their ability to complete high-quality documentation of the services they provide. Effective strategies to improve the quality of patient care documentation among ATs are needed to ensure that their value, particularly in the secondary school setting, is accurately characterized.

Indexed as

DocumentationMedical RecordsPatient CarePhysical Education and TrainingAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSchoolsSurveys and QuestionnairesCORE-AT EMRelectronic medical recordhealth care servicespractice characteristicssecondary school setting

Identifiers

PMID28574752
PMCPMC5517122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.