Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28574667›Full record

ArticleCancer science2017

High density of CD204-positive macrophages predicts worse clinical prognosis in patients with breast cancer.

Yuko Miyasato, Takuya Shiota, Koji Ohnishi, Cheng Pan, Hiromu Yano, Hasita Horlad, Yutaka Yamamoto, Mutsuko Yamamoto-Ibusuki, Hirotaka Iwase, Motohiro Takeya and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Immune Microenvironment in Breast Cancer Metastasis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Vitamin DScientific reports · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. High CD204Journal of Cancer · 2024
    Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuko MiyasatoDepartment of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Takuya ShiotaDepartment of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Koji OhnishiDepartment of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Cheng PanDepartment of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hiromu YanoDepartment of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hasita HorladDepartment of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yutaka YamamotoDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Mutsuko Yamamoto-IbusukiDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Hirotaka IwaseDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Motohiro TakeyaDepartment of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Yoshihiro KomoharaDepartment of Cell Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9723-0846
Kumamoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have indicated the clinical significance of tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) in several malignant tumors including breast cancer. Although recent studies have focused on CD68-positive or CD163-positive TAM in breast cancer, no study has investigated the significance of CD204-positive TAM in breast cancer. We found that CD204 expression on macrophages was evaluated following stimulation with the conditioned medium (CM) of breast cancer cell lines. Paraffin sections of 149 breast cancer samples which were diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma were immunohistochemically analyzed for CD68, CD163 and CD204 expression. The results of analyses indicated that a high number of CD204-positive TAM was associated with worse clinical prognoses, including relapse-free survival, distant relapse-free survival and breast cancer-specific survival; however, neither the numbers of CD68-positive or CD163-positive TAM were associated with clinical courses. Of the clinicopathological factors investigated, estrogen receptor, Ki-67 index, hormone subtype, and histological grade were significantly related to the increased number of CD163-positive and CD204-positive TAM. These data indicate the clinical significance of CD204-positive TAM in breast cancer progression and CD204 is a marker for predicting clinical prognosis in breast cancer.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorCoculture TechniquesCulture Media, ConditionedFemaleHumansMacrophagesMCF-7 CellsMiddle AgedPrognosisScavenger Receptors, Class ASurvival AnalysisTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsUp-RegulationCulture Media, ConditionedMSR1 protein, humanScavenger Receptors, Class ACD163CD204Ki-67macrophageTAM

Identifiers

PMID28574667
PMCPMC5543503
OpenAlexW2621167521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.