Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28574440›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2017

Micro-RNAs as Potential Predictors of Response to Breast Cancer Systemic Therapy: Future Clinical Implications.

Alma D Campos-Parra, Gerardo Cuamani Mitznahuatl, Abraham Pedroza-Torres, Rafael Vázquez Romo, Fany Iris Porras Reyes, Eduardo López-Urrutia, Carlos Pérez-Plasencia

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Crosstalk between long noncoding RNA and microRNA in Cancer.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alma D Campos-ParraLaboratorio de Genomica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Av. San Fernando 22, Col. Sección XVI, C.P. 14080 Tlalpan, Ciudad de México, Mexico. adcamposparra@gmail.com.
Gerardo Cuamani MitznahuatlLaboratorio de Genomica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Av. San Fernando 22, Col. Sección XVI, C.P. 14080 Tlalpan, Ciudad de México, Mexico. cuamanigm@hotmail.com.
Abraham Pedroza-TorresLaboratorio de Genomica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Av. San Fernando 22, Col. Sección XVI, C.P. 14080 Tlalpan, Ciudad de México, Mexico. abraneet@gmail.com.
Rafael Vázquez RomoDepartamento de Cirugia de Tumores mamarios, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Av. San Fernando 22, Col. Sección XVI, C.P. 14080 Tlalpan, Ciudad de México, Mexico. vrrafa@yahoo.com.mx.
Fany Iris Porras ReyesServicio de Anatomia Patologica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Av. San Fernando 22, Col. Sección XVI, C.P. 14080 Tlalpan, Ciudad de México, Mexico. fany.porras@gmail.com.
Eduardo López-UrrutiaUnidad de Biomedicina, FES-IZTACALA, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico (UNAM), Av. De Los Barrios 1, Los Reyes Ixtacala, Hab Los Reyes Ixtacala Barrio de los Árboles/Barrio de los Héroes, C.P. 54090 Tlalnepantla, México, Mexico. e.urrutia@me.com.
Carlos Pérez-PlasenciaUnidad de Biomedicina, FES-IZTACALA, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico (UNAM), Av. De Los Barrios 1, Los Reyes Ixtacala, Hab Los Reyes Ixtacala Barrio de los Árboles/Barrio de los Héroes, C.P. 54090 Tlalnepantla, México, Mexico. carlos.pplas@gmail.com.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXAutonomous University of Tlaxcala · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in diagnosis and new treatments such as targeted therapies, breast cancer (BC) is still the most prevalent tumor in women worldwide and the leading cause of death. The principal obstacle for successful BC treatment is the acquired or de novo resistance of the tumors to the systemic therapy (chemotherapy, endocrine, and targeted therapies) that patients receive. In the era of personalized treatment, several studies have focused on the search for biomarkers capable of predicting the response to this therapy; microRNAs (miRNAs) stand out among these markers due to their broad spectrum or potential clinical applications. miRNAs are conserved small non-coding RNAs that act as negative regulators of gene expression playing an important role in several cellular processes, such as cell proliferation, autophagy, genomic stability, and apoptosis. We reviewed recent data that describe the role of miRNAs as potential predictors of response to systemic treatments in BC. Furthermore, upon analyzing the collected published information, we noticed that the overexpression of miR-155, miR-222, miR-125b, and miR-21 predicts the resistance to the most common systemic treatments; nonetheless, the function of these particular miRNAs must be carefully studied and further analyses are still necessary to increase knowledge about their role and future potential clinical uses in BC.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMicroRNAsPrognosisAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsbreast cancermiRNAsresponse to systemic therapy

Identifiers

PMID28574440
PMCPMC5486005
OpenAlexW2621248998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.