Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28574192›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2017

Feasibility study of ultrasound imaging for stereotactic body radiation therapy with active breathing coordinator in pancreatic cancer.

Lin Su, Iulian Iordachita, Yin Zhang, Junghoon Lee, Sook Kien Ng, Juan Jackson, Ted Hooker, John Wong, Joseph M Herman, H Tutkun Sen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. EUS-guided hydrogel microparticle injection in a cadaveric model.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Stereotactic body radiotherapy: No longer a special procedure?Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lin SuSchool of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Iulian IordachitaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Yin ZhangSchool of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Junghoon LeeSchool of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sook Kien NgSchool of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Juan JacksonSchool of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ted HookerSchool of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
John WongSchool of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Joseph M HermanSchool of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
H Tutkun SenDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Peter KazanzidesDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Muyinatu A Lediju BellDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Chen YangSchool of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kai DingSchool of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · US

Funding

Integrated 3D X-Ray/ultrasound guided radiation therapy of soft tissue targetsR01CA161613 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WONG, JOHN W · 2011 to 2013
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allows for high radiation doses to be delivered to the pancreatic tumors with limited toxicity. Nevertheless, the respiratory motion of the pancreas introduces major uncertainty during SBRT. Ultrasound imaging is a non-ionizing, non-invasive, and real-time technique for intrafraction monitoring. A configuration is not available to place the ultrasound probe during pancreas SBRT for monitoring. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An arm-bridge system was designed and built. A CT scan of the bridge-held ultrasound probe was acquired and fused to ten previously treated pancreatic SBRT patient CTs as virtual simulation CTs. Both step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning were performed on virtual simulation CT. The accuracy of our tracking algorithm was evaluated by programmed motion phantom with simulated breath-hold 3D movement. An IRB-approved volunteer study was also performed to evaluate feasibility of system setup. Three healthy subjects underwent the same patient setup required for pancreas SBRT with active breath control (ABC). 4D ultrasound images were acquired for monitoring. Ten breath-hold cycles were monitored for both phantom and volunteers. For the phantom study, the target motion tracked by ultrasound was compared with motion tracked by the infrared camera. For the volunteer study, the reproducibility of ABC breath-hold was assessed.

resultsThe volunteer study results showed that the arm-bridge system allows placement of an ultrasound probe. The ultrasound monitoring showed less than 2 mm reproducibility of ABC breath-hold in healthy volunteers. The phantom monitoring accuracy is 0.14 ± 0.08 mm, 0.04 ± 0.1 mm, and 0.25 ± 0.09 mm in three directions. On dosimetry part, 100% of virtual simulation plans passed protocol criteria.

conclusionsOur ultrasound system can be potentially used for real-time monitoring during pancreas SBRT without compromising planning quality. The phantom study showed high monitoring accuracy of the system, and the volunteer study showed feasibility of the clinical workflow.

Indexed as

Organ MotionRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRespirationAlgorithmsFeasibility StudiesHumansPancreatic NeoplasmsPhantoms, ImagingRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonography, InterventionalintrafractionpancreasSBRTultrasound

Identifiers

PMID28574192
PMCPMC5529166
OpenAlexW2621231794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.