Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28573683›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2017

Omalizumab substantially improves dermatology-related quality of life in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria.

A Y Finlay, A P Kaplan, L A Beck, E N Antonova, M-M Balp, J Zazzali, S Khalil, M Maurer

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Immunopathogenesis of urticaria: a clinical perspective on histamine and cytokine involvement.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Urticaria.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: The Devil's Itch.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

A Y FinlayDepartment of Dermatology and Wound Healing, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
A P KaplanMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
L A BeckDepartment of Dermatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
E N AntonovaGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
M-M BalpNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
J ZazzaliGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
S KhalilNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
M MaurerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHCardiff University · GBCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic spontaneous/idiopathic urticaria (CSU/CIU) has substantial detrimental effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with an effect comparable to or worse than many other skin diseases.

objectiveTo assess the effect of omalizumab on CSU patients' HRQoL, measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in three phase III studies ASTERIA I, ASTERIA II and GLACIAL.

methodsA post hoc analysis examined changes in DLQI scores, distribution of patients across DLQI bands and the proportion reaching minimal clinically important difference (MCID) following omalizumab vs. placebo.

resultsOmalizumab 300 mg significantly improved total DLQI scores vs. placebo, with a mean decrease from baseline to week 12 of -10.3 vs. -6.1 (P < 0.0001) in ASTERIA I, -10.2 vs. -6.1 (P = 0.0004) in ASTERIA II and -9.7 vs. -5.1 (P < 0.0001) in GLACIAL. A significant shift from high disease impact on life at baseline towards less impact at week 12 was seen with omalizumab 300 mg vs. placebo (P < 0.001; all studies). The proportion of patients where change in mean total DLQI score from baseline to week 12 reached an MCID of ≥4 was 74.1%, 76.0% and 77.2% in ASTERIA I, II and GLACIAL, respectively (P < 0.01; all studies). LIMITATIONS: Maximum duration of omalizumab treatment was 24 weeks.

conclusionThis additional analysis assessed the impact of CSU and benefit of treatment with omalizumab by exploring different facets of DLQI data by treatment arm at multiple assessment points. The original aspects of analysis included applying the concept of the recently validated score for the MCID of the DLQI, changes in DLQI domain scores and in the distribution of subjects based on validated total DLQI score bands. It showed consistently that omalizumab provides significant and clinically relevant improvements in many aspects of HRQoL that are important to patients with CSU. These results contribute to a better understanding of the impact of CSU and its treatment on patients and can support clinical decision-making in routine medical practice.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Allergic AgentsChildChronic DiseaseDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOmalizumabPlacebosUrticariaYoung AdultAnti-Allergic AgentsOmalizumabPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID28573683
PMCPMC5697571
OpenAlexW2620638442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.