Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28573638›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2017

Peribiliary liver metastases MR findings.

Vincenza Granata, Roberta Fusco, Orlando Catalano, Antonio Avallone, Maddalena Leongito, Francesco Izzo, Antonella Petrillo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Radiological assessment of secondary biliary tree lesions: an update.The Journal of international medical research · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Immunotherapy Assessment: A New Paradigm for Radiologists.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincenza GranataRadiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Roberta FuscoRadiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy. r.fusco@istitutotumori.na.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0469-9969
Orlando CatalanoRadiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Antonio AvalloneAbdominal Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Maddalena LeongitoHepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Francesco IzzoHepatobiliary Surgical Oncology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Antonella PetrilloRadiology Division, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We described magnetic resonance (MR) features of peribiliary metastasis and of periductal infiltrative cholangiocarcinoma. We assessed 35 patients, with peribiliary lesions, using MR 4-point confidence scale. T1-weighted (T1-W), T2-weighted (T2-W) and diffusion-weighted images (DWI) signal intensity, enhancement pattern during arterial, portal, equilibrium and hepatobiliary phase were assessed. We identified 24 patients with periductal-infiltrating cholangiocellular carcinoma. The lesions in 34 patients appeared as a single tissue, while in a single patient, the lesions appeared as multiple individual lesions. According to the confidence scale, the median value was 4 for T2-W, 4 for DWI, 3.6 for T1-W in phase, 3.6 for T1-W out phase, 3 for MRI arterial phase, 3.2 for MRI portal phase, 3.2 for MRI equilibrium phase and 3.6 for MRI hepatobiliary phase. According to Bismuth classification, all lesions were type IV. In total, 19 (54.3%) lesions were periductal, 15 (42.9%) lesions were intraperiductal, and 1 (2.8%) lesion was periductal intrahepatic. All lesions showed hypointense signal in T1-W and in ADC maps and hyperintense signal in T2-W and DWI. All lesions showed a progressive contrast enhancement. There was no significant difference in signal intensity and contrast enhancement among all metastases and among all metastases with respect to CCCs, for all imaging acquisitions (p value >0.05). MRI is the method of choice for biliary tract tumors thanks to the possibility to obtain morphological and functional evaluations. T2-W and DW sequences have highest diagnostic performance. MRI does not allow a correct differential diagnosis among different histological types of metastasis and between metastases and CCC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiliary Tract NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedBiliary treeLiver metastasisMagnetic resonance imagingPeribiliary metastasis

Identifiers

PMID28573638
OpenAlexW2620612285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.