Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28573596›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of medical humanities2017

Advancing Pre-Health Humanities as Intensive Research Practice: Principles and Recommendations from a Cross-Divisional Baccalaureate Setting.

Sarah Ann Singer, Kym Weed, Jennifer Edwell, Jordynn Jack, Jane F Thrailkill

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of medical humanities, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarah Ann SingerDepartment of English and Comparative Literature, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3520, USA. sasinger@live.unc.edu.
Kym WeedDepartment of English and Comparative Literature, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3520, USA.
Jennifer EdwellDepartment of English and Comparative Literature, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3520, USA.
Jordynn JackDepartment of English and Comparative Literature, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3520, USA.
Jane F ThrailkillDepartment of English and Comparative Literature, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3520, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This essay argues that pre-health humanities programs should focus on intensive research practice for baccalaureate students and provides three guiding principles for implementing it. Although the interdisciplinary nature of health humanities permits baccalaureate students to use research methods from the natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities, pre-health humanities coursework tends to force students to adopt only one of many disciplinary identities. Alternatively, an intensive research approach invites students to critically select and combine methods from multiple (and seemingly opposing) disciplines to ask and answer questions about health problems more innovatively. Using the authors' experiences with implementing health humanities baccalaureate research initiatives at The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the authors contend that pre-health humanities programs should teach and study multiple disciplinary research methods and their values; examine how health humanities research might transfer across disciplines; and focus on mentoring opportunities for funding, presenting, and publishing research. These recommendations have the potential to create unprecedented research experiences for baccalaureate students as they prepare to enter careers within and beyond the allied health professions.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateInterdisciplinary StudiesResearchCurriculumHumanitiesHumansBaccalaureateHealth humanities labInterdisciplinarityResearch methodsTransfer

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.