ArticleHeart and vessels2017
Nutritional screening based on the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score at the time of admission is useful for long-term prognostic prediction in patients with heart failure requiring hospitalization.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- CONUT Score as a Predictor of Mortality Risk in Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Meta-Analytic Review.Nutrients · 2025Pooled it
- Natriuretic peptides and C-reactive protein in in heart failure and malnutrition: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Association of controlling nutritional status score and long-term mortality in acute pulmonary embolism.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2025Article
- Patients with Severe Trauma Having an Injury Severity Score of 24 and above Develop Nutritional Disorders.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Higher C-Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio Portends Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Observational
- Controlling nutritional status score during hospitalization as a predictor of clinical outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.Scientific reports · 2023Observational
- Controlling nutritional status score predicts 2-year outcomes in elderly patients admitted for acute heart failure.Internal and emergency medicine · 2023Article
- The Relationship Between Mitral Annular Calcification and Controlling Nutritional Status Score.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2022Article
- Controlling Nutritional Status Score Predicts In-Hospital Mortality in Acute Pulmonary Embolism.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2022Article
- Article
- Prognostic Effect of a Novel Simply Calculated Nutritional Index in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.Nutrients · 2020Observational
- Association of lower extremity function with nutritional status and number of drugs in patients with chronic heart failure.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Controlling nutritional status score predicts postoperative complications after hip fracture surgery.BMC geriatrics · 2020Article
- The Additional Prognostic Value of Ghrelin for Mortality and Readmission in Elderly Patients with Acute Heart Failure.Clinical interventions in aging · 2020Article
- Predictors of cardiac function in acute heart failure patients with mid-range ejection fraction: AURORA study.ESC heart failure · 2019Article
- The Baseline Nutritional Status Predicts Long-Term Mortality in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Therapy.Nutrients · 2019Article
- Geriatric nutritional risk index predicts all-cause deaths in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2019Article
- Combined effect of nutritional status on long-term outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Heart and vessels · 2018Observational
- Nutritional Interventions in Heart Failure: Challenges and Opportunities.Current heart failure reports · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the study was to clarify whether controlling nutritional status (CONUT) is useful for predicting the long-term prognosis of patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF). A total of 482 (57.5%) HF patients from the Ibaraki Cardiovascular Assessment Study-HF (N = 838) were enrolled (298 men, 71.7 ± 13.6 years). At admission, blood samples were collected and nutritional status assessed using CONUT. CONUT scores were defined as follows: 0-1, normal; 2-4, light; 5-8, moderate; and 9-12, severe undernutrition. Accordingly, 352 (73%) patients had light-to-severe nutritional disturbances. In the follow-up period [median 541.5 (range 354-786) days], 109 deaths were observed. A Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that all-cause deaths occurred more frequently in HF patients with nutritional disturbances [n = 93 (26.4%)] than in those with normal nutrition [n = 16 (12.3%); log-rank p < 0.001]. The Cox proportional hazard analyses revealed that a per point increase in the CONUT score was associated with an increased risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio 1.142; 95% confidence interval, 1.044-1.249) after controlling simultaneously for age, sex, previous history of HF hospitalization, log brain natriuretic peptide, and use of therapeutic agents at admission (tolvaptan and aldosterone antagonists). This study suggests that nutritional screening using CONUT scores is helpful in predicting the long-term prognosis of patients hospitalized with HF in a multicenter registry setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28573538What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.