Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28573528›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2017

Inpatient hospitalizations in women with and without assisted reproductive technology live birth.

Judy E Stern, Daksha Gopal, Hafsatou Diop, Stacey A Missmer, Charles C Coddington, Barbara Luke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Judy E SternDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA. judy.e.stern@dartmouth.edu.
Daksha GopalDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Hafsatou DiopMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Stacey A MissmerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Charles C CoddingtonDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Barbara LukeDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Funding

Women's Health After Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Population-Based StudyR01HD067270 · NICHD · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI DIOP, HAFSATOU, STERN, JUDY E · 2011 to 2020
$7.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD067270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to evaluate frequency of hospitalization before, during, and after assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment by cycle outcome.

methodsSix thousand and one hundred thirty women residing in Massachusetts undergoing 17,135 cycles of ART reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SARTCORS) from 2004 to 2011 were linked to hospital discharges and vital records. Women were grouped according to ART treatment cycle outcome as: no pregnancy (n = 1840), one or more pregnancies but no live birth (n = 968), or one or more singleton live births (n = 3322). Hospital delivery discharges during 1998-2011 were categorized as occurring before, during, or after the ART treatment. The most prevalent ICD-9 codes for non-delivery hospital discharges were compared. Groups were compared using chi square test using SAS 9.3 software.

resultsThe proportion of any hospitalization was 57.0, 58.3, and 91.3% for women with no pregnancy, no live birth, and ART singleton live birth, respectively; the proportion of non-delivery hospitalizations was 30.4, 31.0, and 28.3%, respectively. The non-ART delivery proportion after ART treatment did not differ by group (33.4, 36.2, and 36.9%, respectively, p = 0.17). Most frequent non-delivery diagnoses (including fibroids, obesity, ectopic pregnancy, depression, and endometriosis) also did not differ by group. A secondary analysis limited to only women with no delivery discharges before the first ART cycle showed similar results.

conclusionsAll groups had live birth deliveries during the study period, suggesting an important contribution of non-ART treatment or treatment-independent conception to overall delivery and live births. Hospitalizations not associated with delivery suggested similarity in morbidity for all ART patients regardless of success with ART treatment.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHospitalizationHumansInpatientsLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeReproductive Techniques, AssistedTreatment OutcomeARTDelivery hospitalizationHospitalizationICD9 codesLinkageWomen’s health outcomes

Identifiers

PMID28573528
PMCPMC5533689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.