Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28573497›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2017

Therapeutic Options for Aggressive T-Cell Lymphomas.

Jennifer K Lue, Anna Kress, Jennifer E Amengual

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biology and Molecular Pathogenesis of Mature T-Cell Lymphomas.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer K LueDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Anna KressDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Jennifer E AmengualDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. jea2149@columbia.edu.
Columbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T-cell lymphomas (TCL) are a rare, heterogeneous group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas associated with very poor prognosis with standard cytotoxic chemotherapy. Epigenetic-based therapy, such as with histone deacetylase inhibitors, was initially discovered to be efficacious in TCL. In recent years, our understanding of the mechanisms driving T-cell lymphomagenesis has validated the use of epigenetic-based drugs and has also led to the development of novel agents with promising efficacy in pre-clinical and early clinical trials. These new treatments play upon the prominent existence of epigenetic and immune dysfunction present in T-cell lymphomas. With these advances, novel therapeutic regimens combining traditional chemotherapy as well as epigenetic and/or immunotherapy serve as promising future treatment options for TCL. In this review, we discuss the traditional methods of treatment for TCL as well as novel agents and combinations that will likely change the treatment paradigms resulting in better clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClinical Trials as TopicDNA MethylationHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansImmunotherapyLymphoma, T-CellSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsEpigeneticsHDAC inhibitorsNovel therapeuticsT-cell lymphomas

Identifiers

PMID28573497
OpenAlexW2620970562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.